Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04776-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reply path
4
path forward
4
forward analysing
4
analysing impacts
4
impacts marine
4
marine protected
4
protected areas
4
reply
1
forward
1
analysing
1

Similar Publications

Objectives: This project aimed to explore the impact of psychological distress (anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress) and resilience on quality of life and psychological health at work (well-being or distress at work) of nursing home and healthcare staff members in the Moselle department in Northeastern France.

Methods: In the spring of 2021 230 professionals replied to an online questionnaire. The theoretical model was tested through path analyses.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Process and dependency are better together: A reply to.

Cognition

November 2025

School of Psychology, University of Auckland, 23 Symonds Street, Building 302, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.

Thanawala and Erb (2024) found that causal judgments in double prevention scenarios are sensitive to the temporal order of events leading up to an outcome, even when the outcome remains constant across the scenarios. These findings challenged the causal pluralism account proposed by Lombrozo (2010) but ultimately supported its core insight: namely, that reasoners think about causal scenarios in terms of both process and dependency. Quillien et al.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Reply to "Comment to 'The laws of physics do not prohibit counterfactual communication' ".

npj Quantum Inf

June 2025

Quantum Engineering Technology Laboratories, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

In his Comment on our recent paper "The laws of physics do not prohibit counterfactual communication", (2022) 8:60, Popescu argues that the claims of the paper are invalid. Here, we refute his argument, showing that it is based on ignoring the specifics of what we set out to prove (that counterfactual communication is possible , and more specifically in these cases is not prohibited by the weak trace or consistent histories criteria for particle path), followed by an unwarranted simplification of the protocol. Moreover, the Comment's excursion into interpretation is misplaced.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF