Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Summary: At present, there is no uniform and quantitative indication standard for periareolar augmentation mastopexy. The authors proposed an indication algorithm and a matched approach to delineate the outer circle, to optimize the result of this operation. Five parameters, including both implant and breast characteristics, were incorporated to form an indication algorithm based on three-dimensional measurement. The indication follows the principle that the circumference of the outer circle should be no more than two times the inner circle. To delineate the outer circle, a "crown" was made on the breast. The above approaches were used on patients who came for periareolar augmentation mastopexy from October of 2015 to January of 2019. Data analyzed included BREAST-Q score, areola diameter, the distance of the sternal notch to the nipple preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively, the distance of nipple elevation 1 year postoperatively, and complication and revision rates. A total of 28 breasts (14 patients) were included in this study. BREAST-Q scores 1-year postoperatively showed significant increases in Satisfaction with Breasts, Psychosocial Well-Being, and Sexual Well-Being ( p = 0.000). The mean areolar diameter preoperatively and postoperatively was 6.7 ± 1.2 cm and 4.6 ± 0.4 cm, respectively ( p = 0.000), and the mean sternal notch-to-nipple distance preoperatively and postoperatively was 22.2 ± 1.9 cm and 18.6 ± 1.0 cm, respectively ( p = 0.000), with an average nipple elevation of 3.2 ± 1.1 cm. The overall complication rate was 7.1 percent ( n = 2); both cases were areolar spreading. The overall revision rate was 0 percent. This preliminary study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the indication and breast crown approach in reducing complication and revision rates.

Clinical Question/level Of Evidence: Therapeutic, IV.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009356DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

periareolar augmentation
12
augmentation mastopexy
12
outer circle
12
indication breast
8
breast crown
8
crown approach
8
indication algorithm
8
delineate outer
8
year postoperatively
8
nipple elevation
8

Similar Publications

Background: Autologous fat transfer to the breast is utilized for various clinical indications, including breast augmentation, reconstruction, and correction of asymmetries and deformities. This study presents the outcomes of patients who underwent simultaneous volume restoration through fat transfer following breast implant removal.

Patients And Methods: Thirty-eight patients received immediate fat transfer to the breast after their implants were removed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Gender-affirming breast augmentation (GABA) with implants is most commonly compared with cosmetic breast augmentation. A better comparator is tuberous breast augmentation (TBA). Anatomically, both feature relative medial pole deficiency, constricted breast footprints, and parenchymal herniation through the areola.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Scar-free on the Chest of Breast Augmentation: A Novel Approach for Implant-Based Mammaplasty.

Plast Reconstr Surg

July 2025

Department of Stomatology, Xi'an Central Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.

Conventional breast augmentation is typically performed using one of three incision techniques: inframammary fold, axillary, periareolar and transumbilical. Each of these methods results in scarring or visible marks, which can be particularly problematic for patients with a predisposition to hypertrophic scarring, such as those of East Asian descent. To address this issue, we propose an innovative implant insertion technique.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Daisy Technique for Periareolar Closure in Breast Surgery.

Aesthetic Plast Surg

May 2025

Belorussian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Brovki 3, b. 3, 220013, Minsk, Belarus.

Periareolar mastopexy often results in the unacceptable scar, widened and distorted areola. Still, many patients' object vertical and horizontal scars pushing the surgeon to limit the procedure to periareolar scar only. We present a technique for periareolar closure in breast surgery which in our hands proved its efficacy primarily for the mastopexy-augmentation patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF