A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Deep learning model improves radiologists' performance in detection and classification of breast lesions. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: Computer-aided diagnosis using deep learning algorithms has been initially applied in the field of mammography, but there is no large-scale clinical application.

Methods: This study proposed to develop and verify an artificial intelligence model based on mammography. Firstly, mammograms retrospectively collected from six centers were randomized to a training dataset and a validation dataset for establishing the model. Secondly, the model was tested by comparing 12 radiologists' performance with and without it. Finally, prospectively enrolled women with mammograms from six centers were diagnosed by radiologists with the model. The detection and diagnostic capabilities were evaluated using the free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) curve and ROC curve.

Results: The sensitivity of model for detecting lesions after matching was 0.908 for false positive rate of 0.25 in unilateral images. The area under ROC curve (AUC) to distinguish the benign lesions from malignant lesions was 0.855 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.830, 0.880]. The performance of 12 radiologists with the model was higher than that of radiologists alone (AUC: 0.852 . 0.805, P=0.005). The mean reading time of with the model was shorter than that of reading alone (80.18 s . 62.28 s, P=0.032). In prospective application, the sensitivity of detection reached 0.887 at false positive rate of 0.25; the AUC of radiologists with the model was 0.983 (95% CI: 0.978, 0.988), with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.36%, 98.07%, 87.76%, and 99.09%, respectively.

Conclusions: The artificial intelligence model exhibits high accuracy for detecting and diagnosing breast lesions, improves diagnostic accuracy and saves time.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742176PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.06.05DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radiologists model
12
model
10
deep learning
8
radiologists' performance
8
breast lesions
8
artificial intelligence
8
intelligence model
8
false positive
8
positive rate
8
rate 025
8

Similar Publications