Effects of Silicone Breast Implants on Human Cell Types In Vitro: A Closer Look on Host and Implant.

Aesthetic Plast Surg

Department of Plastic Surgery, Hand Surgery-Burn Center, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

Published: October 2022


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Silicone (gel) breast implants (SBI) are used world-wide for breast augmentation, and reconstruction or to correct breast deformities. They consist of two compounds: an elastomer silicone shell (envelope) and a silicone gel filler (core). Breast Implant Illness (BII) is a term used for women with SBI, who suffer from various of symptoms including myalgia, arthralgia, fatigue, fever, dry eyes and/or dry mouth (sicca), as well as cognitive disturbances, which are rated by these woman as response to SBI. The pathogenesis of these adverse effects as well as the histocompatibility and the SBI-cell interaction of silicone and its surrounding tissue (implant-host tissue interface) is a subject of current research. The main purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the current knowledge regarding the effects of silicone (gel and elastomer surfaces) of a SBI on different human cell types from experimental - in vitro - models.

Methods: A comprehensive research was conducted by two independent reviewers in March and July of 2020 in the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases.

Results: A number of 1328 articles on this topic were initially identified, of which 62 could be finally included an analysed in this review.

Conclusion: SBI may lead to a physiologic pro-inflammatory and foreign body host response with fibrous encapsulation accompanied by a disturbed Th17/Treg balance and IL-17 production. No causal relationship is known for systemic symptoms and/or autoimmune outcomes in the context of BII.

Level Of Evidence Iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9592657PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02762-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

silicone gel
12
effects silicone
8
breast implants
8
human cell
8
cell types
8
breast
5
silicone
5
sbi
5
silicone breast
4
implants human
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Workplace-related traumatic lip injuries, particularly at the vermilion-cutaneous junction, are challenging due to functional impairment and visible scarring. While typically managed in specialized settings, some cases present in primary care clinics. This report details the successful management of a penetrating laceration at this junction using layered closure and MEBO for optimized healing, with postoperative scar massage therapy to enhance recovery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cells and Shells: Investigating How Breast Implant Shells Negatively Impact Cell Viability In Vitro.

J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater

September 2025

Laboratory of Bioregenerative Medicine and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

The pathophysiology of breast implant-related adverse outcomes, such as capsular contracture and breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, remains poorly understood. Herein, we explore the direct and indirect effects of smooth and textured implant shells on the viability of cell lines found within the peri-breast implant environment in vitro. The outer silicone shells of Allergan and Mentor breast implants were de-gelled and cut to exactly line the walls of 96-well cell culture plates.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The mechanical behavior of prosthetic liners significantly influences stress distribution, soft tissue protection, and the overall efficiency of the prosthetic. While extensive research has been conducted on liner materials, the impact of liner thickness (2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm) on biomechanical response remains underexplored. This study utilizes finite element analysis in Abaqus to investigate how liner material (Gel vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF