A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Comparative study by FEM of different liners of a transfemoral amputated lower limb. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The mechanical behavior of prosthetic liners significantly influences stress distribution, soft tissue protection, and the overall efficiency of the prosthetic. While extensive research has been conducted on liner materials, the impact of liner thickness (2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm) on biomechanical response remains underexplored. This study utilizes finite element analysis in Abaqus to investigate how liner material (Gel vs. Silicone) and thickness affect contact pressure (CPRESS), maximum principal strain (Le. Max), shear stress (CSHEAR1), and vertical displacement (U3) at the residual limb-liner interface. A three-dimensional numerical model was developed to simulate stress transmission and displacement behavior under physiological loading conditions. The results demonstrate that liner thickness plays a critical role in modulating pressure distribution and mechanical stability, with Gel providing superior flexibility and shock absorption, whereas Silicone offers enhanced structural integrity. At a thickness of 2 mm, the highest pressure of 0.4656 MPa is recorded. When the thickness is increased to 4 mm, the pressure decreases to 0.4153 MPa, reflecting a reduction of approximately 10.8%. Further increasing the thickness to 6 mm results in a pressure drop of 0.3825 MPa, corresponding to a total reduction of 17.9%. These findings provide quantitative insights into stress attenuation mechanisms, contributing to the optimization of prosthetic liner design for improved clinical outcomes in lower-limb amputees.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397369PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15974-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

liner thickness
8
thickness 2 mm
8
thickness
6
liner
5
pressure
5
comparative study
4
study fem
4
fem liners
4
liners transfemoral
4
transfemoral amputated
4

Similar Publications