98%
921
2 minutes
20
Aims: While glycemic control is key in effective type 2 diabetes mellitus management, many patients fail to reach their individualized glycemic goal. This analysis aimed to describe a real-world picture of diabetes management: individualized hemoglobin A (HbA) goals, rate of goal attainment, HbA at each line of therapy, and patient awareness of their glycemic goal. Secondly, we aimed to understand physician satisfaction with HbA amongst patients aware vs. those unaware of HbA goal.
Methods: Analysis of physicians and the next ten consulting patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus conducted in Europe and the USA including medical record data abstraction/assessment by physicians, a patient-reported survey and a physician survey. Patients were diagnosed for 3 months or more with a known current and target HbA. For the sub-analysis assessment of patient awareness of HbA goal, in addition to the above, these patients had to have completed a patient-reported questionnaire and answer the question on awareness of HbA goal.
Results: A total of 730 physicians provided data on 8794 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus; 5331 patients were eligible for this analysis. Overall, mean (standard deviation, SD) individualized HbA goal was 6.8% (0.68%). Of eligible patients, 39.1% met their HbA goal; of 60.9% of patients not reaching their HbA goal, the mean distance from individualized HbA goal was 0.9% (SD 1.0%). Physicians progressed patients' antihyperglycemic therapy when HbA was 8% or higher. Among 2560 patients who were included in the sub-analysis assessing the effect of patient awareness of their HbA goal on multiple parameters, 70.5% were aware of their HbA goal; mean HbA goal was 6.8% (0.7%) and current mean HbA value 7.1% (1.2%). A total of 949 patients in the sub-analysis (39.2%) achieved their goal; achieving HbA goal was not related to knowledge of goal. Patients aware of their HbA goal were slightly more adherent to their antihyperglycemic medication. They also were prescribed more antihyperglycemic agents, more often on a later therapy line receiving a GLP-1 receptor agonist, SGLT2i, or insulin, and more often tested their blood glucose levels than patients who were unaware. Physicians were not satisfied with the current blood glucose level of one third of their patients, believing that more of those who were aware of their HbA goal could achieve better glucose control (32.4% of aware vs. 28.2% of unaware patients; p = 0.003).
Conclusions: Our results showed that the proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus achieving their goals for glycemic control was suboptimal when compared to current guideline criteria, with only about 40% of patients achieving their individualized HbA goal. Treatment intensification was often delayed until HbA was 8% and higher. Patients aware of their HbA goal were slightly more adherent to their antihyperglycemic medication; however, awareness of HbA goal did not enhance goal attainment. This highlights the need for a holistic approach to diabetes management, involving patient education, and patient-physician communication and partnership.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706771 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01985-3 | DOI Listing |
J R Coll Physicians Edinb
August 2025
Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Foundation Trust, Leicester, UK.
Introduction: People with diabetes and frailty require less intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia. Previous study has shown low rates of HbA assessment and deintensification for people with diabetes and frailty. Postgraduate doctors in training (PGDiT) is important in the inpatient management of people with diabetes and frailty.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Public Health
July 2025
Department of Economic Analysis and Finances, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain.
Introduction: The aim of this study was to estimate the social value of a tight and early control of patients with type 2 diabetes during the 5 years after diagnosis in Spain, compared to higher hemoglobin A1c (HbA) goals.
Methods: An economic model based on the scientific literature was used to estimate the 5-year social value of maintaining tight and early type 2 diabetes control, i.e.
J Am Coll Cardiol
July 2025
Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Masaryk, Czech Republic.
Background: Obesity is an important risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF). Nonrandomized studies have shown that weight loss and increased physical activity are associated with AF reduction.
Objectives: The goal of this study was to assess whether treatment based on lifestyle modification (LFM; directed weight loss and physical exercise) in combination with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) is noninferior to catheter ablation (CA) in patients with AF and obesity.
Diabetologia
August 2025
Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Aims/hypothesis: Optimal diabetes management for people experiencing homelessness can be a challenge. Our aim was to summarise the existing literature on, highlight emerging evidence for and identify gaps in diabetes care for people experiencing homelessness.
Methods: We undertook a comprehensive and systematic search of 11 databases of published academic literature up to 24 September 2024.
J Med Internet Res
May 2025
Department of Prevention and Care of Diabetes, Department of Medicine III, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Background: Effective diabetes management requires a multimodal approach involving lifestyle changes, pharmacological treatment, and continuous patient education. Self-management demands can be overwhelming for patients, leading to lowered motivation, poor adherence, and compromised therapeutic outcomes. In this context, digital health apps are emerging as vital tools to provide personalized support and enhance diabetes management and clinical outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF