98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose Of Review: To describe barriers to provision of postpartum permanent contraception at patient, hospital, and insurance levels.
Recent Findings: Permanent contraception remains the most commonly used form of contraception in the United States with the majority of procedures performed during birth-hospitalization. Many people live in regions with a high Catholic hospital market share where individual contraceptive plans may be refused based on religious doctrine. Obesity should not preclude an individual from receiving a postpartum tubal ligation as recent studies find that operative time is clinically similar with no increased risk of complications in obese compared with nonobese people. The largest barrier to provision of permanent contraception remains the federally mandated consent for sterilization for those with Medicaid insurance. State variation in enforcement of the Medicaid policy additionally contributes to unequal access and physician reimbursement. Although significant barriers exist in policy that will take time to improve, hospital-based interventions, such as listing postpartum tubal ligation as an 'urgent' procedure or scheduling interval laparoscopic salpingectomy prior to birth-hospitalization discharge can make a significant impact in actualization of desired permanent contraception for patients.
Summary: Unfulfilled requests for permanent contraception result in higher rates of unintended pregnancies, loss of self-efficacy, and higher costs. Hospital and federal policy should protect vulnerable populations while not preventing provision of desired contraception.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000750 | DOI Listing |
Obstet Gynecol
August 2025
School of Medicine and the Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland; and the Department of Global Health, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Objective: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of salpingectomy compared with vasectomy for couples seeking permanent contraception.
Methods: We developed a decision tree model that used TreeAge to evaluate the cost effectiveness of vasectomy compared with salpingectomy for a hypothetical cohort of 800,000 people, the number of male and female patients who undergo permanent contraception procedures in the United States annually. Effectiveness was expressed in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set to $100,000 per QALY gained or lost.
Womens Health (Lond)
August 2025
Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Background: While rural Appalachian adults tend to experience poorer reproductive health and more social drivers of poor health compared to other populations, data on contraception use in rural Appalachia are lacking.
Objective: We aimed to analyze the relationship between rural Appalachian residence and contraception use, focusing on methods that require a provider to access.
Design: The study used a population-representative cross-sectional survey.
JAMA Surg
August 2025
Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Importance: The impact of salpingectomy on the prevention of high-grade serous cancer (HGSC) at the population level is currently under investigation.
Objective: To determine the frequency of missed opportunity for salpingectomy with/without oophorectomy among patients diagnosed with HGSC.
Design, Setting, And Participants: This mixed-methods, multi-institutional retrospective study included patients diagnosed with HGSC at 2 academic medical centers between 2015 and 2021.
Womens Health (Lond)
July 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University at Buffalo, NY, USA.
Background: Patients who request but do not receive postpartum permanent contraception (PC) are at high risk of subsequent short-interval pregnancy.
Objective: To describe contemporary subsequent pregnancy rates in patients requesting but not receiving postpartum PC.
Design: Single-site retrospective cohort study using medical record data of 2720 patients, 388 of whom presented for delivery with a signed Medicaid sterilization form.
BMJ Glob Health
July 2025
Fos Feminista, Washington, DC, USA.
Introduction: The Global Gag Rule (GGR) prohibits non-governmental organisations receiving US international family planning funding from using these funds to provide or refer for abortion services or advocate for abortion law liberalisation. In 2017, President Trump renamed the policy Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance (PLGHA) and expanded it to all US global health assistance funding. On 28 January 2021, President Biden revoked PLGHA.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF