Postpartum permanent contraception: updates on policy and access.

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol

Division of Family Planning Services & Research, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

Published: December 2021


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose Of Review: To describe barriers to provision of postpartum permanent contraception at patient, hospital, and insurance levels.

Recent Findings: Permanent contraception remains the most commonly used form of contraception in the United States with the majority of procedures performed during birth-hospitalization. Many people live in regions with a high Catholic hospital market share where individual contraceptive plans may be refused based on religious doctrine. Obesity should not preclude an individual from receiving a postpartum tubal ligation as recent studies find that operative time is clinically similar with no increased risk of complications in obese compared with nonobese people. The largest barrier to provision of permanent contraception remains the federally mandated consent for sterilization for those with Medicaid insurance. State variation in enforcement of the Medicaid policy additionally contributes to unequal access and physician reimbursement. Although significant barriers exist in policy that will take time to improve, hospital-based interventions, such as listing postpartum tubal ligation as an 'urgent' procedure or scheduling interval laparoscopic salpingectomy prior to birth-hospitalization discharge can make a significant impact in actualization of desired permanent contraception for patients.

Summary: Unfulfilled requests for permanent contraception result in higher rates of unintended pregnancies, loss of self-efficacy, and higher costs. Hospital and federal policy should protect vulnerable populations while not preventing provision of desired contraception.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000750DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

permanent contraception
24
postpartum permanent
8
contraception
8
contraception remains
8
postpartum tubal
8
tubal ligation
8
permanent
5
postpartum
4
contraception updates
4
policy
4

Similar Publications

Cost Effectiveness of Salpingectomy Compared With Vasectomy for Permanent Contraception.

Obstet Gynecol

August 2025

School of Medicine and the Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland; and the Department of Global Health, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.

Objective: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of salpingectomy compared with vasectomy for couples seeking permanent contraception.

Methods: We developed a decision tree model that used TreeAge to evaluate the cost effectiveness of vasectomy compared with salpingectomy for a hypothetical cohort of 800,000 people, the number of male and female patients who undergo permanent contraception procedures in the United States annually. Effectiveness was expressed in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set to $100,000 per QALY gained or lost.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: While rural Appalachian adults tend to experience poorer reproductive health and more social drivers of poor health compared to other populations, data on contraception use in rural Appalachia are lacking.

Objective: We aimed to analyze the relationship between rural Appalachian residence and contraception use, focusing on methods that require a provider to access.

Design: The study used a population-representative cross-sectional survey.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Gauging the Magnitude of Missed Opportunity for Ovarian Cancer Prevention.

JAMA Surg

August 2025

Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Importance: The impact of salpingectomy on the prevention of high-grade serous cancer (HGSC) at the population level is currently under investigation.

Objective: To determine the frequency of missed opportunity for salpingectomy with/without oophorectomy among patients diagnosed with HGSC.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This mixed-methods, multi-institutional retrospective study included patients diagnosed with HGSC at 2 academic medical centers between 2015 and 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients who request but do not receive postpartum permanent contraception (PC) are at high risk of subsequent short-interval pregnancy.

Objective: To describe contemporary subsequent pregnancy rates in patients requesting but not receiving postpartum PC.

Design: Single-site retrospective cohort study using medical record data of 2720 patients, 388 of whom presented for delivery with a signed Medicaid sterilization form.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The Global Gag Rule (GGR) prohibits non-governmental organisations receiving US international family planning funding from using these funds to provide or refer for abortion services or advocate for abortion law liberalisation. In 2017, President Trump renamed the policy Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance (PLGHA) and expanded it to all US global health assistance funding. On 28 January 2021, President Biden revoked PLGHA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF