98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Although previous studies have reported weight bias among students and professionals in exercise science, physical education, kinesiology, and fitness instruction, predictors of weight bias in these professions have not been extensively reviewed.
Aim: The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the available literature on predictors of weight bias in exercise science students and fitness professionals to identify key concepts and research gaps.
Methods: PubMed and ERIC were searched from January 1990 to May 2019. Eighteen studies were included in this review. A thematic analysis was conducted. . Six main themes were drawn from these studies including beliefs in the personal controllability of weight; sex differences; enrollment in a health sciences-related program; psychosocial and personal factors; knowledge of obesity; lack of personal history, family, or friend with obesity. Our scoping review highlighted diverse predictors of weight bias among exercise science students and professionals that warrant further study and intervention.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294971 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5597452 | DOI Listing |
Medicine (Baltimore)
September 2025
The Third Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Background: Multiple non-pharmacological and nonsurgical interventions have demonstrated efficacy in improving abdominal obesity. However, the optimal intervention remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the relative effectiveness and safety of these interventions in reducing waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), body mass index (BMI), and body weight among adults with abdominal obesity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The growing approval and use of digital therapeutics (DTx) for managing chronic diseases, such as diabetes, has prompted questions about their effectiveness.
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to report the effectiveness of DTx interventions in the management of patients with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, and prediabetes.
Methods: Data sources, including Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, were searched from inception to July 30, 2023.
Gastroenterol Hepatol
September 2025
Balearic Health Service, Mallorca, Spain; ADEMA-Health Group of IUNICS, Balearic Islands, Spain. Electronic address:
Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a growing global health concern, particularly among individuals with obesity. While metabolic and behavioral risk factors have been well described, the role of psychosocial determinants, such as weight stigma, remains underexplored.
Objectives: To assess the association between sociodemographic variables, healthy lifestyle behaviors, and internalized weight stigma with MASLD risk in a large cohort of obese workers across Spain.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
September 2025
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) risk models routinely adjust for endoscopic screening because of a) possible confounding with other risk factors and b) possible alteration of natural history of the disease due to adenoma detection and removal.
Methods: In this study, we defined a subject as screen-covered (SC) if a colonoscopy was performed in the past 10 years, and not screen-covered (NSC) otherwise. We created CRC risk models separately for SC and NSC subjects (HRSC, HRNSC) and then obtained a screening-coverage adjusted HR estimate (HRfull) based on a weighted average of ln(HRSC) and ln(HRNSC) with weight equal to the proportion of SC person-time in the NHS population.
Diabetes Ther
September 2025
HaaPACS GmbH, Schriesheim, Germany.
Introduction: Weight and diabetes stigma among healthcare professionals (HCPs) may negatively impact treatment decisions, patient outcomes, and physician-patient interactions. We assessed the relationship between weight stigma, diabetes stigma, perceptions of healthcare quality, and avoidance of healthcare among adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Methods: This observational, online survey-based study included 857 US adults with T2D.