98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: To evaluate the ability of preinduction ultrasonographic cervical length to predict the interval between induction and delivery in women at term with a Bishop score of 4 to 6 at induction.
Study Design: This multicenter prospective observational cohort recruited 334 women from April 2010 to March 2014. Inclusion criteria were women with singleton pregnancies at a gestational age ≥37 weeks, with no previous caesarean, a medical indication for induction of labor, and a Bishop score of 4, 5, or 6. All women underwent cervical assessment by both transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination (Bishop score). The induction protocol was standardized. The primary outcome measure was the induction-delivery interval. Hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used to assess potential predictors.
Results: Mean gestational age at induction was 40.1 weeks, 60.8% of the women were nulliparous, and the cesarean rate was 13.4%. The mean induction-delivery interval was 20.8 h (± 10.6). Delivery occurred within 24 h for 56.9% (n=190) of the women. An ultrasonographic cervical length measurement less than 25 mm (HR=1.50, 95% CI 1.18-1.91, P<0.01) and parity (HR=1.41, 95% CI 1.21-1.65, P<0.01) appeared to predict induction-delivery interval. The cervical length cutoff to reduce the induction-delivery interval was 25 mm.
Conclusion: A cervical length cutoff of 25 mm was associated with shorter induction-delivery interval in women at term with a Bishop score of 4 to 6.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102196 | DOI Listing |
J Obstet Gynaecol Can
August 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Objective: To determine whether combined methods of labour preinduction are more effective and safer compared to a single method. In addition, we assessed whether shorter Foley catheter maintenance is more beneficial in reducing the time from preinduction to delivery. A significant topic in medical practice remains the use of prostaglandins (PGs) in women after previous cesarean delivery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Pregnancy Childbirth
April 2025
Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Introduction: Intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD), one of the most tragic outcomes of pregnancy, affects approximately 1% of pregnancies. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of mifepristone combined with misoprostol versus misoprostol alone in inducing labor in women with IUFD.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of scientific databases from their inception up to July 29, 2024.
Cureus
February 2025
Department of Data Science, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Udupi, IND.
Introduction And Aim: Current clinical practice advocates and supports a trial of labor after one previous lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) if the pregnant woman wishes to have a vaginal delivery. Induction of labor with pharmacological agents can pose a risk of uterine rupture in women with previous LSCS. Induction with mechanical methods is a safe alternative.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUltrasound
November 2024
Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ghana Med J
March 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Medical Centre, Asaba, Delta State, Nigeria.
Objective: To compare cervical ripening time with the use of vaginal Misoprostol plus Hyoscine-N-Butylbromide, with vaginal Misoprostol alone.
Design: A double-blind randomized controlled trial with Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR) approval number PACTR202112821475292.
Setting: Federal Medical Centre, Asaba, Nigeria.