Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The bonding performance of a surface pre-reacted glass ionomer (S-PRG) filler-containing self-adhesive flowable resin composites to enamel and dentin were evaluated using a tensile bond test with thermal cycling. Also, the quantities of various ions released from the materials were measured using ICP atomic emission spectrometry and a fluoride ion electrode. The initial bond strengths of the materials were approximately 6 MPa, and decreased after thermal cycling. The S-PRG filler-containing self-adhesive flowable resin composites materials exhibited much higher ion release compared with the commercial self-adhesive flowable resin composite possibly due to different acidic monomers contained. It was suggested that the S-PRG filler containing self-adhesive flowable resin composites should be limited as a lining material or to restore small cavities in non-stress bearing areas.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2020-142DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

self-adhesive flowable
16
flowable resin
16
resin composites
12
bonding performance
8
resin composite
8
s-prg filler-containing
8
filler-containing self-adhesive
8
thermal cycling
8
self-adhesive
5
resin
5

Similar Publications

One of the common forms of dental injury is anterior crown fractures, which mainly affect teenagers and young adults. Fractures of the coronal portion of the permanent incisors characterize 18-22% of total traumatic injuries to dental hard tissues, of which 96% of them comprise the maxillary incisors. An uncomplicated fracture of the crown is one of the most common types of dental traumatic injury.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Self-adhesive flowable resins (SAFR) entered the market, eliminating the adhesive system application due to their self-adhesive technology. Guided by the PICO framework (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome), the aim was to conduct a systematic review of clinical studies to compare the clinical performance of Self Adhesive Flowable Resin (SAFRs) with conventional flowable resins used for direct restorations. : The protocol of this systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023394297) and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Evaluation of Microleakage and Micromorphological Analysis of Different Self-Adhesive Restorative Systems in Class V Cavities: Laboratory Study.

J Clin Exp Dent

July 2025

Professor, BDS, MDS, PhD, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt, Algomhoria Street, Mansoura, Aldakhlia, Egypt P.O.

Background: Microleakage is a common problem that affects the longevity of restorative materials in Class V cavities. It is influenced by factors such as the type of restorative materials, composition of the cavity margins and aging. This study aimed to evaluate and compare microleakage and micromorphological analysis of restoration-dentin interface for Class V cavities restored with resin modified glass ionomer cement, self-adhesive flowable composite and self-adhesive composite hybrid before and after thermocycling for 10000 cycles.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Adhesive dentistry has revolutionized with the proposal of self-adhesive composites (SACs), which aim to simplify restorative procedures by omitting the need for separate dental bonding agents' applications. Even though the limitations of these composites, including their questionable bond strength and long-term durability, remain our issues. Therefore, this in vitro study suggests a novel BMEP monomer designed to enhance the dental composite's physicochemical and mechanical properties.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study aimed to evaluate the fracture resistance of different bonding materials used in fragment reattachment for uncomplicated crown fractures, compared to direct composite resin restoration. Sixty human maxillary incisors were divided into five groups (n = 12): G1, control; G2, direct composite resin; G3, flowable composite; G4, preheated composite; G5, self-adhesive resin cement. After simulated fractures and thermocycling, fracture resistance was tested using a universal machine.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF