A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Real-time dynamic changes in intraocular pressure after occlusion break: comparing 2 phacoemulsification systems. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To compare real-time intraocular pressure (IOP) response to occlusion break event in 2 phacoemulsification systems.

Setting: Iladevi Cataract and IOL Research Center, India.

Design: Randomized, experimental study.

Methods: Rabbits were randomized to:Group I (n = 10 eyes), Centurion Vision system with active fluidics, or, Group II (n = 10 eyes), Centurion with Active Sentry. Within each group, parameter set 1 (IOP 30 mm Hg, aspiration flow rate [AFR] 20 mL/min, and vacuum 600 mm Hg) and parameter set 2 (IOP 50 mm Hg, AFR 25 mL/min, and vacuum 600 mm Hg) were tested. Real-time rate of drop and rise of IOP after occlusion break event (mm Hg per second) and percentage reduction of IOP from maximum during nuclear fragment removal were compared.

Results: 10 rabbits (20 eyes) were included. Rate of drop of IOP after occlusion break was not significantly different between groups. Rate of rise of IOP was statistically significantly higher in Group II with both parameter sets (199.09 ± 69.28 vs 94.33 ± 45.66 in parameter set 1, P = .006; and 256 ± 45.05 vs 165.25 ± 51.80 in parameter set 2, P = .005), suggesting faster recovery to baseline IOP after occlusion break. The mean percentage reduction of IOP from maximum was significantly higher in Group I (P = .003).

Conclusions: Rise of IOP to baseline after occlusion break event was faster and mean percentage reduction of IOP from maximum during nuclear fragment removal was lower when using the Centurion Vision system with the Active Sentry upgrade compared with the traditional handpiece. The ability to sense IOP at the level of the handpiece with the Active Sentry upgrade allows faster mitigation of surge response.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000666DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

occlusion break
24
parameter set
16
iop
12
break event
12
active sentry
12
rise iop
12
iop occlusion
12
percentage reduction
12
reduction iop
12
iop maximum
12

Similar Publications