Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: Evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of enzalutamide and abiraterone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is limited to meta-analyses of randomized trials that exclude patients with significant comorbidities. We evaluated overall survival (OS) in patients with chemotherapy-naive mCRPC treated with enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate (abiraterone) in a real-world single payer setting.

Methods: A retrospective analysis (4/1/2014-3/31/2018) of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) database was conducted. Patients with mCRPC had ≥1 pharmacy claim for enzalutamide or abiraterone (first claim date = index date) following disease progression on surgical/medical castration, without chemotherapy <12 months prior to index date. Patients had continuous VHA enrollment for ≥12 months pre-index date and were followed until death, disenrollment, or end of study. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models examined the OS treatment effect.

Results: Patients with chemotherapy-naive mCRPC (N = 3174; enzalutamide, n = 1229; abiraterone, n = 1945) had mean ages of 74 and 73 years, respectively. Median follow-up was 18.27 and 19.07 months with enzalutamide and abiraterone, respectively. Enzalutamide-treated patients had longer median treatment duration than abiraterone-treated patients (9.93 vs 8.47 months, respectively, p = 0.0008). After baseline comorbidity adjustment, enzalutamide-treated patients had a 16% reduced risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.94; p = 0.0012). For patients who remained on first line-therapy only, enzalutamide-treated patients had improved OS versus abiraterone-treated patients (HR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.62-0.82). Enzalutamide-treated patients who crossed over to abiraterone had a comparable risk of death versus abiraterone-treated patients who crossed over to enzalutamide (HR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.89-1.35). These results were confirmed by sensitivity analysis, which considered prognostic variables.

Conclusions: Retrospective analysis of the VHA database indicated that chemotherapy-naive patients with mCRPC initiating therapy with enzalutamide had improved survival versus abiraterone.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616757PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00318-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

enzalutamide abiraterone
16
patients chemotherapy-naive
8
metastatic castration-resistant
8
castration-resistant prostate
8
prostate cancer
8
treated enzalutamide
8
abiraterone acetate
8
patients
5
abiraterone
5
survival outcomes
4

Similar Publications

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and adverse effects of combining enzalutamide with docetaxel versus using docetaxel alone in treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that progresses after treatment with abiraterone followed by enzalutamide.

Methods: A retrospective analysis involved 67 mCRPC patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University's Urology Department between October 2021 and August 2023. All experienced disease progression after treatment with abiraterone and enzalutamide.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To assess the comparative efficacy of intensified systemic treatments in older patients (≥ 65 years) with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) through a network meta-analysis (NMA), and evaluate whether routine use of intensified regimens is justified in this population. A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases identified randomized controlled trials published between 2000 and 2024 evaluating first-line systemic therapies in mHSPC. Eligible studies combined androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, darolutamide, or antiandrogens.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Novel hormonal agents (NHAs), including enzalutamide, abiraterone acetate, apalutamide, and darolutamide, have improved survival in advanced prostate cancer (PCa). However, their potential neurological adverse effects (AEs)-notably cognitive impairment, seizures, and falls-raise safety concerns, particularly in older adults. This study aimed to compare the neurological safety profiles of NHAs in men with advanced PCa using a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered (CAR)-T cell therapy for metastatic prostate cancer.

Cancer Lett

August 2025

Department of Urology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA; The Urology Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA; Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA; Department of Pharmacology, Case We

Metastatic prostate cancer is associated with a significantly reduced survival rate, often indicating a more aggressive disease phenotype with diminished responsiveness to conventional therapies. Several FDA-approved treatments have demonstrated improved overall survival in men with metastatic disease. These include androgen receptor signaling inhibitors such as enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate, taxane-based chemotherapies including docetaxel and cabazitaxel, and bone-targeting radiopharmaceuticals like radium-223.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF