Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background Context: The introduction and integration of robot technology into modern spine surgery provides surgeons with millimeter accuracy for pedicle screw placement. Coupled with computer-based navigation platforms, robot-assisted spine surgery utilizes augmented reality to potentially improve the safety profile of instrumentation.

Purpose: In this study, the authors seek to determine the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement compared to conventional free-hand (FH) technique.

Study Design/setting: We conducted a systematic review of the electronic databases using different MeSH terms from 1980 to 2020.

Outcome Measures: The present study measures pedicle screw accuracy, complication rates, proximal-facet joint violation, intraoperative radiation time, radiation dosage, and length of surgery.

Results: A total of 1,525 patients (7,379 pedicle screws) from 19 studies with 777 patients (51.0% with 3,684 pedicle screws) in the robotic-assisted group were included. Perfect pedicle screw accuracy, as categorized by Gerztbein-Robbin Grade A, was significantly superior with robotic-assisted surgery compared to FH-technique (Odds ratio [OR]: 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-2.35; p=.003). Similarly, clinically acceptable pedicle screw accuracy (Grade A+B) was significantly higher with robotic-assisted surgery versus FH-technique (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.01-2.37; p=.05). Furthermore, the complication rates and proximal-facet joint violation were 69% (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.20-0.48; p<.00001) and 92% less likely (OR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.03-0.20; p<.00001) with robotic-assisted surgery versus FH-group. Robotic-assisted pedicle screw implantation significantly reduced intraoperative radiation time (MD: -5.30, 95% CI: -6.83-3.76; p<.00001) and radiation dosage (MD: -3.70, 95% CI: -4.80-2.60; p<.00001) compared to the conventional FH-group. However, the length of surgery was significantly higher with robotic-assisted surgery (MD: 22.70, 95% CI: 6.57-38.83; p=.006) compared to the FH-group.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis corroborates the accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.09.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pedicle screw
20
pedicle screws
12
screw accuracy
12
pedicle
8
compared conventional
8
conventional free-hand
8
systematic review
8
spine surgery
8
screw placement
8
complication rates
8

Similar Publications

Objective: Reveal the changing rule of the positional relationship between the uncinate process of cervical spine and vertebral artery by measuring the relevant parameters between the uncinate process of cervical spine and vertebral artery in different age groups.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 1240 cases of cervical spine imaging data from 2018 to 2021 in the Radiology Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University. The distance between the uncinate process superior ridge and vertebral artery and the maximum of pedicle transverse angle, the minimum of pedicle transverse angle, the range of pedicle transverse angle and the pedicle width were measured according to age groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

On the biomechanics of a novel L5-S1 posterior fixation system: A finite element study.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H

September 2025

IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.

Low back pain is estimated to affect more than 70% of the population. Recently, interspinous posterior devices are gaining attention as a less invasive alternative to the traditional pedicle screw systems. However, since most of these devices are not suitable for the L5-S1 segment, the goals for this study are to design a tailored fixation system for the L5-S1 level and to study its effects on the degenerated spine.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the predictive efficacy of quantitative CT (QCT)-based endplate volumetric bone mineral density (EP-vBMD) and MRI-based endplate vertebral bone quality (EBQ) score for cage subsidence (CS) after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF).

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent single-level LLIF in conjunction with pedicle screw fixation at the authors' institution between January 2019 and April 2023. The volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) was measured based on preoperative CT using phantom-less QCT software.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The purpose of this study is to propose a standardized classification of minimally invasive cervical pedicle screw (MICEPS) fixation according to the levels instrumented and the extent of the construct, thereby facilitating reproducible surgical planning and technique. We developed a three-tiered MICEPS classification with a specific surgical algorithm based on anatomic levels and construct length: Type 1, subaxial cervical fixation; Type 2, subaxial cervical to proximal thoracic fixation; and Type 3, subaxial cervical to T3/4 cervicothoracic stabilization. All techniques employ O-arm intraoperative navigation and preserve posterior tension-band integrity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To establish a two-segment vertebrectomy model using the finite element method, and to measure and compare the biomechanical properties of the lower cervical anterior transpedicular root screw (ATPRS) plate system, lower cervical anterior pedicle screw (ATPS) plate system, and lower cervical anterior cervical locked-plate (ACLP) system on this model.

Methods: CT data of the cervical spine (C-T) from a 34-year-old healthy adult male volunteer were collected. A nonlinear complete model of the lower cervical spine (C-C) was established using Mimics 10.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF