Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To describe the length of encounter during visits where goals-of-care (GoC) discussions were expected to take place.

Methods: Oncologists from community, academic, municipal, and rural hospitals were randomly assigned to receive a coaching model of communication skills to facilitate GoC discussions with patients with newly diagnosed advanced solid-tumor cancer with a prognosis of < 2 years. Patients were surveyed after the first restaging visit regarding the quality of the GoC discussion on a scale of 0-10 (0 = worst; 10 = best), with ≥ 8 indicating a high-quality GoC discussion. Visits were audiotaped, and total encounter time was measured.

Results: The median face-to-face time oncologists spent during a GoC discussion was 15 minutes (range, 10-20 minutes). Among the different hospital types, there was no significant difference in encounter time. There was no difference in the length of the encounter whether a high-quality GoC discussion took place or not (15 14 minutes; = .9). If there was imaging evidence of cancer progression, the median encounter time was 18 minutes compared with 13 minutes for no progression ( = .03). In a multivariate model, oncologist productivity, patient age, and Medicare coverage affected duration of the encounter.

Conclusion: Oncologists can complete high-quality GoC discussions in 15 minutes. These data refute the common misperception that discussing such matters with patients with advanced cancer requires significant time.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JOP.19.00743DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

goc discussion
16
goc discussions
12
high-quality goc
12
encounter time
12
length encounter
8
goc
7
time
6
minutes
6
encounter
5
conducting goals-of-care
4

Similar Publications

Background: Goals of care (GOC) discussions align medical care with patients' wishes. Many physician-associated barriers to GOC discussions have been identified, but there is little understanding of the lived experiences of patients and their nominated health care spokespersons (NHSs) who have participated in the discussion.

Objectives: We aimed to describe the lived experience of participants of GOC discussions conducted during acute inpatient care and identify the features of well-conducted GOC discussions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Oxidative Stress and Neurotoxicity Biomarkers in Fish Toxicology.

Antioxidants (Basel)

July 2025

Department of Animal Environment Biology, Institute of Animal Science, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.

Exposure to xenobiotics causes pathophysiological changes in fish, including oxidative stress and neurotoxicity. Here, we describe the biochemical mechanisms underlying oxidative stress (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Discussing GOC is essential to ensuring that patients' treatment recommendations and care plans are aligned with their preferences, priorities, and values. This review aims to characterize the existing literature on the quality, practices, and frameworks of goals of care (GOC) discussions in surgery to identify gaps and propose strategies for improvement.

Methods: MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process/ePubs, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

BackgroundWhile rapid response teams (RRT) are widely implemented to address clinical deterioration in hospitalized patients, their impact on goals of care (GOC) discussions remains underexplored.AimsWe aimed to evaluate whether RRT activations were associated with subsequent goals of care discussions, code status changes, and clinical outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective single-center review of hospitalized adult patients admitted to medicine services who had RRT activations between January and December 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Goals of care (GOC) discussions are vital to understanding patients' values and preferences during serious illness, but they occur infrequently during Emergency Department (ED) care. We report a single site sub-study of a stepped wedge pragmatic trial of a multi-component intervention of primary palliative care in the ED (PRIM-ER), focused on GOC conversations. A retrospective cohort study of ED patients who either died or had a referral to hospice within 48 h or were admitted to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF