Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objectives: Pain is common in cancer, affecting more than 70% of patients with advanced disease. Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) are a well-established treatment for patients with refractory cancer pain, improving pain control and reducing associated side effects. To date, details of systemic opioid use before and after IDDS implant have not been reported.

Materials And Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients at Huntsman Cancer Institute-University of Utah treated with IDDS for cancer pain from May 2014 to May 2018. Oral, transdermal, and parenteral opioid use before IDDS implant was compared to use 30 days postoperatively.

Results: A total of 173 patients were included, 93% with stage IV disease. The pre-implant median daily oral morphine equivalent (OME) was 240 mg (interquartile range 130-390, range 0-2616 mg). OME doses >200 mg/day were required by 57% of patients, and >500 mg OME by 19% of patients. The post-implant median OME was 0 mg (interquartile range 0-0, range 0-480 mg) and 82.6% of patients discontinued systemic opioids completely. 11.0% of patients used <100 mg OME, and only 1.7% of patients used >200 mg OME. Mean OME decreased by 94% following IDDS implant (p < 0.0001) and all patients who continued to use systemic opioids required a lower OME compared to pre-implant.

Conclusions: In the largest cohort of patients with advanced cancer and refractory pain treated with IDDS, implantation was associated with a dramatic reduction in systemic opioid use 30 days postoperatively, with a large majority of patients discontinuing systemic opioids. Those patients that continued systemic opioids utilized significantly lower doses as compared to their pre-implant dose.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.13175DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

idds implant
12
patients
9
intrathecal drug
8
drug delivery
8
systemic opioid
8
patients advanced
8
cancer pain
8
opioid idds
8
interquartile range
8
ome
6

Similar Publications

High Cervical Intrathecal Targeted Drug Delivery for Refractory Neuropathic Craniofacial Pain.

Neuromodulation

June 2025

Department of Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA. Electronic address:

Objectives: Neuropathic craniofacial pain syndromes are heterogeneous with regards to clinical presentation and etiology. As such, they pose a diagnostic and management challenge, and are often refractory to medical and interventional management. High cervical intrathecal drug delivery has been reported in the management of refractory cancer-related craniofacial pain, although the literature regarding its use in neuropathic craniofacial pain remains limited.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Trialing Strategies Prior to Intrathecal Drug Delivery in Cancer-Related Pain: A Narrative Review.

Curr Pain Headache Rep

June 2025

Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

Purpose Of Review: Cancer-related pain poses a significant clinical challenge, especially in advanced stages where systemic analgesic therapies become insufficient or intolerable. Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) offer targeted pain control while minimizing systemic exposure. However, the optimal trialing approach before permanent IDDS implantation remains contentious.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Ultrasound Wirelessly Controlled Electrically Responsive Implantable Drug Delivery System for Enhanced Tumor Therapy.

Small

August 2025

Department of Orthopedics Trauma and Microsurgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.

Implantable controlled local drug delivery offers many advantages over systemic delivery. However, wirelessly controlling drug release from implanted devices via exogenous stimulation remains challenging. Herein, an ultrasound wirelessly controlled electrically responsive implantable drug delivery system (UI-TENG-IDDS) is proposed, which consists of an ultrasound-driven implantable triboelectric nanogenerator (UI-TENG) and an electrically responsive drug reservoir.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Systemic amyloidosis can cause severe refractory pain, often inadequately managed with conventional analgesics. Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) have been used for chronic pain control but are rarely reported in amyloidosis cases.

Case Report: We present a female patient in her late 50s with systemic light-chain amyloidosis and type III intestinal failure, experiencing significant weight loss and debilitating abdominal pain during enteral and parenteral feeding.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Intrathecal drug delivery systems: A case series advancing surgical, clinical, and technological safety with broader implications for invasive neuromodulation therapies.

SAGE Open Med Case Rep

April 2025

Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) represent an advanced modality of invasive pharmacological neuromodulation, providing efficacious treatment for terminal malignant pain as well as select chronic noncancer pain conditions. Although intrathecal drug delivery systems offer the potential for reduced systemic adverse effects compared to conventional routes, they are not without significant complications, including infections, device dysfunction, and severe neurological injuries. Moreover, the integration of network-based smart-device applications into intrathecal drug delivery system control interfaces introduces a concomitant elevation in risks associated with software errors and cybersecurity vulnerabilities.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF