98%
921
2 minutes
20
Rats first given 24-h access to 10% sucrose for 4 or 12 days (Stage 1) were then switched to a saccharin solution for a 12-day Stage 2. The initial result of this switch was that these Sucrose groups drank less saccharin than Water groups that had been given only water to drink in Stage 1. This difference was maintained throughout Stage 2 by the females that served in Experiments 1 and 4 and by the males that served in Experiment 3. Experiment 1 also found that access to 10% glucose in Stage 1 produced an essentially identical decrease in subsequent saccharin acceptance as that produced by giving 10% sucrose in Stage 1. The impact on subsequent acceptance of saccharin was also tested in rats given two types of maltodextrin solution. The first type of maltodextrin (Myopure brand) was used with the males in Experiment 2; this failed to find any difference between the Maltodextrin and the Water group. However, when a second type of maltodextrin (SolCarb brand) was given to males in Stage 1 of Experiment 3, the results for this group were similar to those from a group given sucrose in Stage 1. The final experiment confirmed that prior exposure to maltodextrin solutions can reduce saccharin acceptance by female rats. Overall, the results suggest that acceptance of saccharin is sensitive to a contrast effect, in that it is reduced by prior exposure to a solution that is more palatable but not necessarily sweet.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.112822 | DOI Listing |
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess
August 2025
Faculdade de Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade Estadual de Campinas-UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
High-intensity sweeteners (HIS) are food additives that impart a sweet taste with low or no calories associated. Their intakes are considered safe below the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI); thus, assessing the population's exposure to these substances is a fundamental step in the context of risk assessment. Although there are some studies on exposure to HIS in Brazil, no information is available for children.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNutrients
March 2025
Department of Health Studies, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Background/objectives: Artificial sweeteners (ASs) are food additives used to impart sweetness to various food products. Common sweeteners used individually or in combination include acesulfame-K, aspartame, cyclamate, saccharin, sucralose, and neotame. While traditionally considered harmless, emerging research suggest potential health implications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Nutr
March 2025
Max Rubner-Institut, Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of Nutrition, Haid-und-Neu-Str. 9, D-76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Purpose: We aimed to quantify urinary excretion of LNCS (Low- and No-Calorie Sweeteners) and to identify LNCS-associated food consumption in Germany, with special emphasis on exposure to combinations of different LNCS.
Methods: UPLC-MS/MS was used to quantify LNCS metabolites in 24-hour urine samples of 301 participants from the cross-sectional KarMeN (Karlsruhe Metabolomics and Nutrition) study. Dietary data were assessed via 24 h recall.
This opinion deals with the re-evaluation of saccharin and its sodium, potassium and calcium salts (E 954) as food additives. Saccharin is the chemically manufactured compound 1,2-benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one-1,1-dioxide. Along with its sodium (Na), potassium (K) and calcium (Ca) salts, they are authorised as sweeteners (E 954).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMetabolites
October 2024
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Background: Non/low-caloric artificial sweeteners (NAS) are recognized as chemical additives substituting sugars to avoid caloric intake and subsequent sugar-derived diseases such as diabetes and hyperglycemia. Six NAS have been claimed safe and are authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for public use, with acceptable daily intake information available: aspartame, acesulfame-K, saccharin, sucralose, neotame, and advantame. However, the impacts of NAS on the gut microbiome have raised potential concerns, since sporadic research revealed NAS-induced microbial changes in the gastrointestinal tracts and alterations in the microbiome-host interactive metabolism.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF