98%
921
2 minutes
20
Fundamental to the understanding of the functions of spatial cognition and attention is to clarify the underlying neural mechanisms. It is clear that relatively right-dominant activity in ventral and dorsal parieto-frontal cortex is associated with attentional reorienting, certain forms of mental imagery and spatial working memory for higher loads, while lesions mostly to right ventral areas cause spatial neglect with pathological attentional biases to the right side. In contrast, complementary leftward biases in healthy people, called pseudoneglect, have been associated with varying patterns of cortical activity. Notably, this inconsistency may be explained, at least in part, by the fact that pseudoneglect studies have often employed experimental paradigms that do not control sufficiently for cognitive processes unrelated to pseudoneglect. To address this issue, here we administered a carefully designed continuum of pseudoneglect and control tasks in healthy adults while using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Data submitted to partial least square (PLS) imaging analysis yielded a significant latent variable that identified a right-dominant network of brain regions along the intra-occipital and -parietal sulci, frontal eye fields and right ventral cortex in association with perceptual pseudoneglect. Our results shed new light on the interplay of attentional and cognitive systems in pseudoneglect.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116402 | DOI Listing |
Cortex
September 2025
Human Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Strauch et al. (2022) introduced a novel approach to assess biases of visual attention, by measuring pupillary constriction in response to split-field stimuli, in which a bright patch is presented to one visual field and a dark patch to the other. Their study suggested that pupillary constriction is more pronounced in response to bright stimuli in the left visual field compared to the right, consistent with a neurotypical attentional bias towards the left side (pseudoneglect).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
July 2025
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Pseudoneglect, considered the archetype of spatial attentional asymmetries among neurologically healthy individuals, is traditionally described as a consistent leftward error in visuo-spatial tasks. Here we challenge this notion by revealing a consistent rightward "internal" bias in a task where participants' representational encoding of visuo-spatial information is captured. Our meta-analysis across seven experiments in 1750 neurotypical individuals robustly demonstrates a rightward internal bias in the expectations of objects in space.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
May 2025
Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Numerical and spatial representations are intertwined as in the Mental Number Line, where smaller numbers are on the left and larger numbers on the right. This relationship has been repeatedly demonstrated with various experimental approaches, such as the line bisection task. Spatial accuracy appears to be systematically distorted leftward for smaller digits by elaboration of spatial codes during number processing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExp Brain Res
April 2025
Department of Psychology Scarborough, University of Toronto, Scarborough, ON, M1C1A4, Canada.
Major evidence for a right-hemisphere dominance of the brain in spatial and/or attentional tasks comes from lesion studies in patients with spatial neglect. However, the neuroanatomy of the different forms of neglect remains a matter of debate, and it remains unclear how dysfunctions in neglect relate to intact processes. In the healthy brain, perceptual pseudoneglect has been considered to be a phenomenon complementary to specific subtypes of neglect as observed in paradigms such as the line bisection task.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Vis
March 2025
Clinical Neuropsychology, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
The perception of ambiguous stimuli, notably binocular rivalry (BR), has been demonstrated to be influenced by spatial context. Previous results are, however, inconsistent with regard to whether the context biases perception toward the BR target that matches the context or toward the one that differs from the context. Furthermore, it is unclear what roles the perceptual ambiguity of the context and its lateral location play.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF