Outcomes and Resource Utilization in Robotic Mitral Valve Repair: Beyond the Learning Curve.

Background: After the initial learning curve associated with mastering a robotic procedure, there is a plateau where operative time and complication rates stabilize. Our objective was to evaluate one surgeon's experience with robotic mitral valve repairs (MVRep) beyond the learning curve and to compare its effectiveness against the traditional open approach.

Methods: Data from Ronald Reagan University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center was prospectively collected from January 2008 to March 2016 to identify adult patients undergoing robotic MVRep. Operative times, complication rates, and cost for robotic versus open MVRep were compared using multivariate regressions, adjusting for comorbidities and previous cardiac surgeries.

Results: During the study period, 175 robotic (41%) and 259 open (59%) MVRep cases were performed at our institution. As the surgeon performed more robotic operations, there was a decrease in room time (554-410 min, P < 0.001), surgery time (405-271 min, P < 0.001), and cross-clamp times (179-93 min, P < 0.001). After application of a multivariate regression model, robotic MVRep was associated with lower odds of complications (odds ratio = 0.42, P = 0.001), shorter length of stay (β = -2.51, P < 0.001), and a reduction of 11% in direct (P = 0.003) and 24% in room costs (P < 0.001), but a 51% increase in surgery cost (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: As the surgeon gained experience with robotic MVRep, operative times decreased in a steady manner. Robotic MVRep had comparable outcomes to open MVRep and lower overall cost. The observed difference in costs is likely related to shorter length of stay and lower room cost with the robotic approach.