98%
921
2 minutes
20
It is well known that the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and frontal motor cortices in primates preferentially control voluntary movements of contralateral limbs. The PPC of rats has been defined based on patterns of thalamic and cortical connectivity. The anatomical characteristics of this area suggest that it may be homologous to the PPC of primates. However, its functional roles in voluntary forelimb movements have not been well understood, particularly in the lateralization of motor limb representation; that is, the limb-specific activity representations for right and left forelimb movements. We examined functional spike activity of the PPC and two motor cortices, the primary motor cortex (M1) and the secondary motor cortex (M2), when head-fixed male rats performed right or left unilateral movements. Unlike primates, PPC neurons in rodents were found to preferentially represent ipsilateral forelimb movements, in contrast to the contralateral preference of M1 and M2 neurons. Consistent with these observations, optogenetic activation of PPC and motor cortices, respectively, evoked ipsilaterally and contralaterally biased forelimb movements. Finally, we examined the effects of optogenetic manipulation on task performance. PPC or M1 inhibition by optogenetic GABA release shifted the behavioral limb preference contralaterally or ipsilaterally, respectively. In addition, weak optogenetic PPC activation, which was insufficient to evoke motor responses by itself, shifted the preference ipsilaterally; although similar M1 activation showed no effects on task performance. These paradoxical observations suggest that the PPC plays evolutionarily different roles in forelimb control between primates and rodents. In rodents, the primary and secondary motor cortices (M1 and M2, respectively) are involved in voluntary movements with contralateral preference. However, it remains unclear whether and how the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) participates in controlling multiple limb movements. We recorded functional activity from these areas using a behavioral task to monitor movements of the right and left forelimbs separately. PPC neurons preferentially represented ipsilateral forelimb movements and optogenetic PPC activation evoked ipsilaterally biased forelimb movements. Optogenetic PPC inhibition via GABA release shifted the behavioral limb preference contralaterally during task performance, whereas weak optogenetic PPC activation, which was insufficient to evoke motor responses by itself, shifted the preference ipsilaterally. Our findings suggest rodent PPC contributes to ipsilaterally biased motor response and/or planning.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6335753 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1584-18.2018 | DOI Listing |
Sci Adv
September 2025
School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710072, China.
Flying vertebrates use specialized wingbeat kinematics in hovering, takeoff, and landing, featuring ventrally anterior downstrokes and aerodynamically inactive upstrokes to enhance aerodynamic characteristics at low airspeeds. Rarely implemented in robotics, this inspired RoboFalcon2.0, a flapping-wing robot with reconfigurable mechanisms performing bioinspired flap-sweep-fold (FSF) motion for controlled bird-style takeoff.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiol Open
August 2025
TUM Senior Excellence Faculty, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstraße 21, 80333 München, Germany.
Results of recent research show that bats perform flights with continual altitude changes rather than flying at a constant altitude. However, the current state of knowledge suggests that the reason for these altitude changes is not known, and it is stated in the literature that further study is necessary in order to understand this behaviour. The goal of this paper is to provide an explanation by showing that flights with continual altitude changes constitute a fuel-saving flight mode in bats.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ R Soc Interface
August 2025
School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Insects show diverse flight kinematics and morphologies reflecting their evolutionary histories and ecological adaptations. Many silk moths use low wingbeat frequencies and large wings to fly and display body oscillations. Their bodies pitch and bob periodically, synchronized with their wingbeat cycle.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProc Natl Acad Sci U S A
September 2025
Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Biological flyers periodically flap their appendages to generate aerodynamic forces. Extensive studies have made significant progress in explaining the physics behind their propulsion in cruising by developing scaling laws of their flight kinematics. Notably Strouhal number (; ratio of flapping frequency times stroke amplitude to cruising speed) has been found to fall in a narrow range for animal cruising flights.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Neural Circuits
August 2025
Laboratory of Functional Brain Circuit Construction, Graduate School of Brain Science, Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan.
Bimanual movements consist of simultaneous and nonsimultaneous movements. The neural mechanisms of unimanual and nonsimultaneous bimanual movements have been explored in rodent studies through electrophysiological recordings and calcium imaging techniques. However, the neural bases of simultaneous bimanual movements remain poorly understood because of a lack of effective training procedures for such movements in head-fixed rodents.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF