Real-world effectiveness of daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir and velpatasvir/sofosbuvir in hepatitis C genotype 2 and 3.

J Hepatol

Department of Veterans Affairs, Population Health Services, Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA. Electronic address:

Published: January 2019


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background & Aim: Understanding the real-world effectiveness of all-oral hepatitis C virus (HCV) regimens informs treatment decisions. We evaluated the effectiveness of daclatasvir + sofosbuvir ± ribavirin (DCV + SOF ± RBV) and velpatasvir/sofosbuvir (VEL/SOF) ± RBV in patients with genotype 2 and genotype 3 infection treated in routine practice.

Methods: This observational analysis was carried out in an intent-to-treat cohort of patients with HCV genotype 2 and genotype 3. Sustained virologic response (SVR) analysis was performed in 5,400 patients initiated on DCV + SOF ± RBV or VEL/SOF ± RBV at any Department of Veterans Affairs facility.

Results: For genotype 2, SVR rates did not differ between DCV + SOF (94.5%) and VEL/SOF (94.4%) or between DCV + SOF + RBV (88.1%) and VEL/SOF + RBV (89.5%). For genotype 3, SVR rates did not differ between DCV + SOF (90.8%) and VEL/SOF (92.0%) or between DCV + SOF + RBV (88.1%) and VEL/SOF + RBV (86.4%). In multivariate models of patients with genotype 2 and 3 infection, the treatment regimen was not a significant predictor of the odds of SVR. For genotype 3, significant predictors of reduced odds of SVR were prior HCV treatment-experience (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.72; p <0.001), FIB-4 >3.25 (OR 0.60; 95%CI 0.43-0.84; p = 0.002) and a history of decompensated liver disease (OR 0.68; 95%CI 0.47-0.98; p = 0.04). For patients with genotype 2 and 3, treated with VEL/SOF ± RBV, 89% and 85% received 12-weeks of treatment, respectively. For DCV + SOF ± RBV, 56% and 20% of patients with HCV genotype 2 received 12-weeks and 24-weeks of treatment, respectively; while 53% and 23% of patients with HCV genotype 3 received 12-weeks and 24-weeks, with most direct-acting antiviral experienced patients receiving 24-weeks.

Conclusions: In patients infected with HCV genotype 2 and 3, DCV + SOF ± RBV and VEL/SOF ± RBV produced similar SVR rates within each genotype, and the regimen did not have a significant impact on the odds of SVR. For patients with genotype 3, prior treatment-experience and advanced liver disease were significant predictors of reduced odds of SVR regardless of regimen.

Lay Summary: In clinical practice, cure rates for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 were 94% and cure rates for HCV genotype 3 were 90%. The chance of achieving cure was the same whether a person received daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir or velpatasvir/sofosbuvir. Ribavirin did not affect cure rates. The chance of a cure was lowest in people who had received HCV medication in the past.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.09.018DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hcv genotype
24
genotype
17
patients genotype
16
odds svr
16
patients hcv
12
svr rates
12
received 12-weeks
12
cure rates
12
patients
10
hcv
9

Similar Publications

To assess the efficacy and safety of the Velpatasvir (VEL)/Sofosbuvir (SOF) with or without Ribavirin (RBV) in treating patients with decompensated hepatitis C cirrhosis. We searched multiple databases for studies published from October 2010 to September 2024. Outcomes of interest were sustained viral response at 12 weeks (SVR12) and the safety of VEL/SOF with and without RBV regimens in patients with decompensated hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Epidemiological and genetic analysis of SEN virus infections in hemodialysis patients and healthy individuals in Tehran, Iran.

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis

September 2025

Department of Mycobacteriology and Pulmonary Research, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran; Microbiology Research Center (MRC), Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address:

This case-control study investigated the epidemiological and genetic distribution of SEN virus (SENV) infections among 1,576 hemodialysis (HD) patients and 1,000 age- and gender-matched healthy individuals in Iran between 2017 and 2024. Nested PCR was utilized to amplify the ORF1 gene, facilitating the identification and sequencing of SENV genotypes D and H. The results demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of SENV among HD patients (45.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have transformed hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in Australia since their inclusion on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) in 2016. Treatment has shifted from genotype-specific to pan-genotypic regimens, with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir now recommended in clinical guidelines. This study examined trends in DAA dispensing in light of evolving treatment regimens.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim Of The Study: One of the main causes of cancer-related death worldwide is hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which is significantly common in Egypt because of the high prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The development of HCC has been linked to genetic variations in the (rs58542926) and (rs738409) genes. The aim of this study was to assess PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 genetic variants as risk factors for HCC in Egyptian patients with chronic HCV disease.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Identification of microorganisms in a biological sample is a crucial step in diagnostics, pathogen screening, biomedical research, evolutionary studies, agriculture, and biological threat assessment. While progress has been made in studying larger organisms, there is a need for an efficient and scalable method that can handle thousands of whole genomes for organisms with high mutation rates and genetic diversity such as single stranded viruses. In this study, we developed a novel method to identify subsequences for detection of a given species/subspecies in a (meta)genomic sample using the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) method.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF