Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Plaque erosion causes 30% of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions, but the underlying cause is unknown. Inflammatory infiltrates are less abundant in erosion compared with rupture in autopsy studies. We hypothesized that erosion and rupture are associated with significant differences in intracoronary cytokines in vivo.

Methods And Results: Forty ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with <6 hours of chest pain were classified as ruptured fibrous cap (RFC) or intact fibrous cap (IFC) using optical coherence tomography. Plasma samples from the infarct-related artery and a peripheral artery were analyzed for expression of 102 cytokines using arrays; results were confirmed with ELISA. Thrombectomy samples were analyzed for differential mRNA expression using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Twenty-three lesions were classified as RFC (58%), 15 as IFC (38%), and 2 were undefined (4%). In addition, 12% (12 of 102) of cytokines were differentially expressed in both coronary and peripheral plasma. I-TAC was preferentially expressed in RFC (significance analysis of microarrays adjusted <0.001; ELISA IFC 10.2 versus RFC 10.8 log pg/mL; =0.042). IFC was associated with preferential expression of epidermal growth factor (significance analysis of microarrays adjusted <0.001; ELISA IFC 7.42 versus RFC 6.63 log pg/mL, =0.036) and thrombospondin 1 (significance analysis of microarrays adjusted =0.03; ELISA IFC 10.4 versus RFC 8.65 log ng/mL, =0.0041). Thrombectomy mRNA showed elevated I-TAC in RFC (=0.0007) epidermal growth factor expression in IFC (=0.0264) but no differences in expression of thrombospondin 1.

Conclusions: These results demonstrate differential intracoronary cytokine expression in RFC and IFC. Elevated thrombospondin 1 and epidermal growth factor may play an etiological role in erosion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524113PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005868DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

st-segment elevation
12
elevation myocardial
12
plaque erosion
8
erosion rupture
8
myocardial infarction
8
inflammatory differences
4
differences plaque
4
erosion
4
rupture patients
4
patients st-segment
4

Similar Publications

Impact of diabetes on outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Clin Res Cardiol

September 2025

Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Center for Translational and Experimental Cardiology (CTEC), University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.

Background: Diabetic patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are at an increased risk of cardiovascular events as compared to non-diabetic patients. This analysis investigated outcomes of diabetic patients presenting with multivessel disease (MVD) and STEMI in a contemporary trial and the relevance of an immediate versus staged multivessel PCI strategy in this high-risk population.

Methods: Patients enrolled in the MULTISTARS AMI trial were stratified according to the presence/absence of diabetes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Improving Door-In-Door-Out Times for STEMI Transfer Patients: Impact of a Protocolized Autolaunch Process.

JACC Case Rep

July 2025

Department of Emergency Medicine, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, Texas, USA; Texas Emergency Medicine Research Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Background: The timely transfer of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to percutaneous coronary intervention-capable centers is critical for improving outcomes. Although the American Heart Association recommends a door-in-door-out (DIDO) time of ≤30 minutes, national compliance remains low.

Project Rationale: At Harris Health, no patients with STEMI met this benchmark before 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim        To compare the results of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) in patients who recently recovered from COVID-19 with those not previously infected with SARS-CoV-2; to establish prognostic criteria for PCI complications, including stent thrombosis and restenosis (ST and SR) and progression of ischemic heart disease, and to determine ways to prevent them.Material and methods         In 2021, middle-aged patients admitted to the Baku Central Clinical Hospital with a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome who underwent urgent myocardial revascularization using percutaneous balloon angioplasty of the occluded coronary artery (CA) with implantation of a second-generation intracoronary drug-eluting stent were divided into two observation groups: the main group of 123 patients who had COVID-19 in the previous 6 months, and the control group of 112 patients who were not previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. The immediate results of PCI were assessed according to the TIMI scale; complications were assessed both clinically, by the incidence of severe complications (major adverse cardiovascular events, MACE), and angiographically, by the incidence of early and late ST and SR, and de novo stenosis that developed during the two-year observation period.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Coronary microvascular disease has been found to increase the incidence of the composite endpoint for cardiovascular events and affect coronary revascularization. Coronary microvascular disease is often accompanied by epicardial disease, and despite successful revascularization and optimal medications, coronary microvascular disease may lead to reduced exercise tolerance and worsening clinical symptoms. Moreover, despite advances in percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary revascularization, the management of microvascular obstruction in reperfused myocardial tissue remains challenging and is a high-risk procedure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Globally, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is among the primary causes of mortality. The ideal approach for blood pressure (BP) management for patients experiencing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who receive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains a topic of ongoing debate. Current guidelines on BP management lack specific recommendations for STEMI patients undergoing PCI, resulting in substantial individual variability and uncertainties in clinical treatment strategies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF