98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Internal fixation modalities of unstable (>50 percent articular involvement) middle phalangeal volar lip fracture-dislocations include interfragmentary screw and volar buttress plating. This study investigates the mechanical properties (yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, and stiffness) of interfragmentary screw (IS), simple buttress plating (BP) and buttress plating with subchondral screw (BP+S).
Methods: Fifteen cadaveric digits (5 index, 5 middle, and 5 ring) were prepared by excising its skin envelope and flexor tendons while preserving the structures around the proximal interphalangeal joint. An oblique osteotomy involving 50 percent of the articular surface was performed, and this was fixed with based on its study group: interfragmentary screw (IS), simple buttress plating (BP) and buttress plating with subchondral screw (BP+S). These specimens were then loaded to failure.
Results: Yield strength was as follows: BP+S (33.5±9.76 N), IS (13.6±5.46 N), and BP (8.1±3.84 N). Ultimate tensile strength was as follows: BP+S (49.1±21.4 N), IS (15.6±5.19 N), and BP (8.86±3.99 N). Stiffness was as follows: BP+S (4.77±1.32 N/mm), IS (2.44±0.86 N/mm), and BP (1.84±0.71 N/mm).
Conclusions: A buttress plate and screw construct confers significantly more stability than either interfragmentary screw or buttress plate only fixation in an experimental model.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218810417500022 | DOI Listing |
J Clin Orthop Trauma
November 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Many fixation options exist for the treatment of posterior wall fragments in acetabular fractures, however, there is a limited amount of comparative clinical studies. In current practice, the most common methods of fixation in posterior wall fractures include traditional buttress compression plating along with spring plates. Conversely, recent studies have been published showing the use of non-traditional implants that have been found to produce good clinical outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ World Fed Orthod
August 2025
Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Background: This study aimed to compare palatal versus buccal protraction using plates assisted with a facemask in growing Class III patients.
Methods: Twenty growing Class III patients were randomly allocated into two main groups. In Group 1, a surgical mini-plate was bent into a semicircular shape and adapted to the patient's model to extend from the canine area on one side to the contralateral canine area.
J Orthop Trauma
July 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, Grady Memorial Hospital, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Objectives: To compare arthroplasty versus fixation of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in non-geriatric patients.
Methods: Design: Retrospective.
Setting: Level one trauma center.
Purpose: Intertrochanteric fractures are the most common type of proximal femur fractures, with lateral wall fractures occurring in approximately 33% of cases. This meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of intramedullary fixation methods, specifically the proximal femoral nail (PFN) and the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA), to other treatment options.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase, following PRISMA guidelines.
J Orthop Surg Res
July 2025
Children's Orthopedics Department, Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics, treatment methods, and functional outcomes of children with Dubberley Type IIA capitellar fractures.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of pediatric patients diagnosed and surgically treated for capitellar fractures at the Pediatric Orthopedics Department of Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital from June 2018 to June 2024. Fractures were classified according to the Dubberley system, and functional outcomes were evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) at the final follow-up.