98%
921
2 minutes
20
Whilst professional bodies such as the Royal College and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have well-established standards for audit of management for most gynaecology disorders, such standards for premenstrual disorders (PMDs) have yet to be developed. The International Society of Premenstrual Disorders (ISPMD) has already published three consensus papers on PMDs covering areas that include definition, classification/quantification, clinical trial design and management (American College Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2011; Brown et al. in Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD001396, 2009; Dickerson et al. in Am Fam Physician 67(8):1743-1752, 2003). In this fourth consensus of ISPMD, we aim to create a set of auditable standards for the clinical management of PMDs. All members of the original ISPMD consensus group were invited to submit one or more auditable standards to be eligible in the inclusion of the consensus. Ninety-five percent of members (18/19) responded with at least one auditable standard. A total of 66 auditable standards were received, which were returned to all group members who then ranked the standards in order of priority, before the results were collated. Proposed standards related to the diagnosis of PMDs identified the importance of obtaining an accurate history, that a symptom diary should be kept for 2 months prior to diagnosis and that symptom reporting demonstrates symptoms in the premenstrual phase of the menstrual cycle and relieved by menstruation. Regarding treatment, the most important standards were the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) as a first line treatment, an evidence-based approach to treatment and that SSRI side effects are properly explained to patients. A set of comprehensive standards to be used in the diagnosis and treatment of PMD has been established, for which PMD management can be audited against for standardised and improved care.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00737-016-0631-7 | DOI Listing |
Drug Alcohol Depend
August 2025
Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Objective: To estimate the association between medical and legal gender affirmation with problematic substance use among transfeminine adults.
Methods: Data from a longitudinal cohort (The LITE Study) were analyzed (n = 1186). Participants were enrolled between March 2018 and August 2020 and followed for 2 years.
Cureus
August 2025
Medicine, Salford Royal National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR.
Introduction Oxygen is a routinely administered, yet prescription-only therapy in hospital settings. Inappropriate prescribing can result in significant harm, particularly in patients at risk of type 2 respiratory failure. This audit aimed to evaluate adherence to guidelines on oxygen prescribing during admission clerking in the Emergency Assessment Unit (EAU) of Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, a UK tertiary care hospital.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEquine Vet J
September 2025
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies Equine Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Background: Surgical safety checklists have demonstrated a positive impact on post-surgical morbidity/mortality in human medicine, and likely have an equal benefit in veterinary medicine. To realise their advantages, they must be correctly and regularly used. A clinical audit was planned to assess this.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFVet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract
September 2025
Kinder Ground, Byrdstown, TN, USA. Electronic address:
Animal welfare assessments on farms have been used to enforce minimum standards to maintain market access but have delivered limited improvement in the overall welfare of farm animals. Veterinarians are uniquely positioned to incorporate animal welfare assessment into practice as a diagnostic tool for continuous improvement promoting the welfare of animals in production. Practical assessment of welfare does not have to emulate or duplicate audits that may already be done by outside parties to meet supplier contracts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWorld J Surg
September 2025
Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC (Location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Background: Predictive models in surgery promise to improve clinical care by anticipating complications, guiding decision-making, and supporting personalized treatment strategies. Although their potential to enhance outcomes and efficiency is substantial, their integration into clinical practice also raises profound ethical challenges.
Ethical Framework: These challenges span the entire lifecycle of predictive models from data collection and development to validation and clinical use.