Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The goal of this article is to promote clear thinking and clear writing among students and teachers of psychological science by curbing terminological misinformation and confusion. To this end, we present a provisional list of 50 commonly used terms in psychology, psychiatry, and allied fields that should be avoided, or at most used sparingly and with explicit caveats. We provide corrective information for students, instructors, and researchers regarding these terms, which we organize for expository purposes into five categories: inaccurate or misleading terms, frequently misused terms, ambiguous terms, oxymorons, and pleonasms. For each term, we (a) explain why it is problematic, (b) delineate one or more examples of its misuse, and (c) when pertinent, offer recommendations for preferable terms. By being more judicious in their use of terminology, psychologists and psychiatrists can foster clearer thinking in their students and the field at large regarding mental phenomena.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4522609PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01100DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

inaccurate misleading
8
terms
7
fifty psychological
4
psychological psychiatric
4
psychiatric terms
4
terms avoid
4
avoid list
4
list inaccurate
4
misleading misused
4
misused ambiguous
4

Similar Publications

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently shown significant advancements in video understanding, excelling in content reasoning and instruction-following tasks. However, hallucination, where models generate inaccurate or misleading content, remains underexplored in the video domain. Building on the observation that MLLM visual encoders often fail to distinguish visually different yet semantically similar video pairs, we introduce VIDHALLUC, the largest benchmark designed to examine hallucinations in MLLMs for video understanding.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Inaccurate and misleading terminology may impede the protection of people and wildlife from adverse effects of lead ammunition.

Environ Pollut

August 2025

Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK; School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norfolk, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK. Electronic address:

Inaccurate terminology and misinformation about lead (Pb) ammunition's toxicity may obstruct proposed regulation requiring use of non-lead substitutes. Elemental lead of anthropogenic origin in the environment is often confused with naturally-occurring lead ore compounds in the scientific literature, leading to suggestions that its use cannot be regulated. Inaccurate and misleading statements about the composition of substitutes for lead ammunition and fishing weights can cause public misunderstanding about their use and hinder proposals to end the use of lead-based products.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This study explores the alignment between themes identified by Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered tools and those from a traditional, manual scoping review, focusing on generative AI's role in streamlining time-intensive research processes.

Materials And Methods: Thematic findings from a human-driven scoping review on peer support specialists in medical settings for opioid use disorder (OUD) were compared with outputs from NotebookLM, UTVERSE, and Gemini. Fifteen peer-reviewed articles were uploaded to each AI tool, and a standardized prompt directed the generative AI to identify themes using only the provided articles, which were then compared to the human-coded findings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

ChatGPT as an information source for cochlear implants: A study on accuracy and reproducibility.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

July 2025

Department of Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Objective: This study evaluates ChatGPT's accuracy and reproducibility in answering patient inquiries about cochlear implantation.

Method: Forty-one questions were compiled from cochlear implant company websites, clinics, patient support groups, and social media. Questions were categorized into five topics: basic knowledge, information on surgery process, expected results and limitations, answering questions from candidates and families, and technical features of cochlear implant.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Use and misuse of the sedimentation sign in lumbar spine stenosis.

Eur Spine J

July 2025

Hirslanden Clinique Cecil, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Purpose: The nerve root sedimentation sign (SedSign), introduced in 2010, is a radiological marker for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) on MRI. Despite widespread adoption, methodological inconsistencies in its application across studies have raised concerns about validity. This systematic review evaluated the accuracy of SedSign definitions and their impact on conclusions in published research.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF