Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the first step treatment in cholelithiasis. The purpose of this study was to establish a radiologic view on prediction of conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery.

Methods: This study included 176 patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Preoperative ultrasonographic findings were assessed and we gave points to each finding according to results from correlation analysis. After the scoring we investigated the relationship between ultrasonographic findings and conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery.

Results: Scoring significantly predicted failure in laparoscopic approach (AUC=0.758, P=0.003,). Optimal cut off score was found to be 1.95 with 67% sensitivity and 78% specificity. Score>1.95 was a risk factor for failure in laparoscopic approach [odds ratio=7.1(95% CI,2-24.9, P=0.002)]. There were 8 subjects out of 36(22%) with high score underwent open surgery while 4 out of 128 (3%) subjects with low score needed open surgery (p=0.002). Negative predictive value of 128/132=97%. Mean score of whole study population was 1.28 (range 0-8.8) and mean score of subjects underwent open surgery was 3.6 while it was 1.1 in successful laparoscopic approach group (p<0.001). Mean Age and BMI were similar between groups (p>0.05). Sex of subjects did not affect the success of surgery (p>0.05).

Conclusion: The contribution of preoperative ultrasonography is emphasized in many studies. Our study suggests quantitative results on conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. We believe that radiologists have to indicate the risk of conversion in their ultrasonography reports.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laparoscopic cholecystectomy
24
open surgery
20
conversion laparoscopic
16
cholecystectomy open
16
laparoscopic approach
12
laparoscopic
9
ultrasonographic findings
8
failure laparoscopic
8
underwent open
8
open
7

Similar Publications

This study aimed to identify the biomarkers that was associated with the postoperative incisional pain in patients with acute cholecystitis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery (ACC-LC). Sixty ACC-LC patients were enrolled and divided into mild pain (MP) and moderate-to-severe pain (MSP) groups based on their visual analog scale (VAS) scores 24 hours postoperatively. RNA sequencing was used to screen the potential pain associated markers, and ELISA were used to analyze the expression of one identified marker, CXCR5 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We describe a case of a 64-year-old obese woman with a history of severe acute cholecystitis and choledocholithias who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our clinic after endoscopic treatment by sphincterotomy and stent insertion. On the first operative day, a significant bile leakage of 400 ml appeared in the drainage. An immediate surgical revision was performed, starting by laparoscopy with conversion to open surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Bile duct injury (BDI) is a potentially devastating complication of cholecystectomy. Although the repair may be successful, patients often experience a decline in their quality of life (QoL). However, there is a paucity of data regarding the factors influencing long-term outcomes and QOL in these patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In recent years, global cholecyst-related disorders have been increasing daily. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is an advanced gallbladder surgical technique. However, pneumoperitoneum and various factors leading to abdominal distension and other gastrointestinal dysfunctions are common postoperative complications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a commonly used tumor marker, primarily for the surveillance of colorectal and other gastrointestinal malignancies. However, its diagnostic specificity is limited, as CEA levels may be elevated in several benign conditions. This case report aims to highlight the potential diagnostic confusion and psychological distress caused by incidental CEA elevation in asymptomatic individuals when tested outside of an appropriate clinical context.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF