Do you hear where I hear?: isolating the individualized sound localization cues.

Front Neurosci

Air Force Research Laboratory Dayton, OH, USA.

Published: December 2014


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that individualized head-related transfer function (HRTF) measurements are needed to adequately capture all of the 3D spatial hearing cues. However, many perceptual studies have shown that localization accuracy in the lateral dimension is only minimally decreased by the use of non-individualized head-related transfer functions. This evidence supports the idea that the individualized components of an HRTF could be isolated from those that are more general in nature. In the present study we decomposed the HRTF at each location into average, lateral and intraconic spectral components, along with an ITD in an effort to isolate the sound localization cues that are responsible for the inter-individual differences in localization performance. HRTFs for a given listener were then reconstructed systematically with components that were both individualized and non-individualized in nature, and the effect of each modification was analyzed via a virtual localization test where brief 250 ms noise bursts were rendered with the modified HRTFs. Results indicate that the cues important for individualization of HRTFs are contained almost exclusively in the intraconic portion of the HRTF spectra and localization is only minimally affected by introducing non-individualized cues into the other HRTF components. These results provide new insights into what specific inter-individual differences in head-related acoustical features are most relevant to sound localization, and provide a framework for how future human-machine interfaces might be more effectively generalized and/or individualized.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4249451PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00370DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sound localization
12
localization cues
8
head-related transfer
8
inter-individual differences
8
localization
7
individualized
5
cues
5
hrtf
5
hear hear?
4
hear? isolating
4

Similar Publications

Reverberation cues underlying virtual auditory distance perception for a frontal source.

J Acoust Soc Am

September 2025

ENTPE, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CNRS, LTDS, UMR5513, 69518 Vaulx-en-Velin, France.

This study investigated the potential role of temporal, spectral, and binaural room-induced cues for the perception of virtual auditory distance. Listeners judged the perceived distance of a frontal source simulated between 0.5 and 10 m in a room via headphones, with eyes closed in a soundproof booth.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Spatial hearing enables both voluntary localization of sound sources and automatic monitoring of the surroundings. The auditory looming bias (ALB), characterized by the prioritized processing of approaching (looming) sounds over receding ones, is thought to serve as an early hazard detection mechanism. The bias could theoretically reflect an adaptation to the low-level acoustic properties of approaching sounds, or alternatively necessitate the sound to be localizable in space.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cricoid Force: Anatomic, Physiologic, and Clinical Concepts.

Anesthesiology

October 2025

Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

The application of cricoid force remains controversial in modern practice. This review critically assesses the anatomic, physiologic, and contemporary clinical evidence of cricoid force application. There may be a sound anatomic basis to cricoid force application, involving occlusion of the postcricoid hypopharynx, but the physiologic basis is uncertain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of different hearing devices on sound localization and speech perception in individuals with single-sided deafness (SSD). Specifically, the study sought to assess the performance of softband bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs) and contralateral routing of signals hearing aids (CROS HA) in various conditions to determine their effectiveness in improving auditory outcomes for SSD patients.

Method: Eighteen participants (aged between 20 and 50 years) with SSD underwent tests using softband BAHA, CROS HA, and unaided conditions in a counterbalanced design.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Early sensory experience can exert lasting perceptual consequences. For example, a brief period of auditory deprivation early in life can lead to persistent spatial hearing deficits. Some forms of hearing loss (i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF