Current use of implantable electrical devices in Sweden: data from the Swedish pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry.

Europace

Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Published: January 2015


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aims: The National Swedish Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Registry collects prospective data on all pacemaker and ICD implants in Sweden. We aimed to report the 2012 findings of the Registry concerning electrical devices implantation rates and changes over time, 1 year complications, long-term device longevity and patient survival.

Methods And Results: Forty-four Swedish implanting centres continuously contribute implantation of pacemakers and ICDs to the Registry by direct data entry on a specific website. Clinical and technical information on 2012 first implants and postoperative complications were analysed and compared with previous years. Patient survival data were obtained from the Swedish population register database. In 2012, the mean pacemaker and ICD first implantation rates were 697 and 136 per million inhabitants, respectively. The number of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) first implantations/million capita was 41 (CRT pacemakers) and 55 (CRT defibrillators), with only a slight increase in CRT-ICD rate compared with 2011. Most device implantations were performed in men. Complication rates for pacemaker and ICD procedures were 5.3 and 10.1% at 1 year, respectively. Device and lead longevity differed among manufacturers. Pacemaker patients were older at the time of first implant and had generally worse survival rate than ICD patients (63 vs. 82% after 5 years).

Conclusion: Pacemaker and ICD implantation rates seem to have reached a level phase in Sweden. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and CRT implantation rates are very low and do not reflect guideline indications. Gender differences in CRT and ICD implantations are pronounced. Device and patient survival rates are variable, and should be considered when deciding device type.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu233DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pacemaker icd
16
implantation rates
16
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
12
electrical devices
8
data swedish
8
swedish pacemaker
8
pacemaker implantable
8
patient survival
8
icd implantation
8
pacemaker
7

Similar Publications

Objective: To identify clinical characteristics, anatomical distribution and risk factors of arteriovenous fistula in the head and neck area (hAVF).

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis on individual participant data of available literature from inception to September 2024 on extracranial and extradural hAVF was performed.

Results: The systematic search resulted in an inclusion of 869 cases with a median age of 35 years and 58.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The increasing prevalence of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has led to greater data collection, including pacing impedance, a key measure of lead integrity and electrical function. While acute impedance changes may signal lead fractures or insulation defects, gradual increases are often linked to tissue-interface calcification. The optimal management of patients with progressively rising impedance remains uncertain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: CIED patients are routinely advised against physical activity with a risk of collision because of expected damage to the implanted device. However, no data support this practice.

Methods: Sixteen CIED systems (6 pacemakers, 6 ICD, 4 CRT-D) from all manufacturers were implanted subcutaneously in a porcine thorax and increasing weights were dropped on the experimental setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing invasive procedures, including permanent pacemaker implantation. Leadless pacemakers (L-VVI) have emerged as an alternative to traditional transvenous pacemakers (TV-VVI), especially in ESRD patients to reduce infection rates and preserve vasculature for dialysis access. However, there is limited data comparing the safety and procedural complications following L-VVI and TV-VVI implantation in ESRD patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF