98%
921
2 minutes
20
There is growing evidence that auditory selective attention operates via distinct facilitatory and inhibitory mechanisms enabling selective enhancement and suppression of sound processing, respectively. The lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) plays a crucial role in the top-down control of selective attention. However, whether the LPFC controls facilitatory, inhibitory, or both attentional mechanisms is unclear. Facilitatory and inhibitory mechanisms were assessed, in patients with LPFC damage, by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) to attended and ignored sounds with ERPs to these same sounds when attention was equally distributed to all sounds. In control subjects, we observed 2 late frontally distributed ERP components: a transient facilitatory component occurring from 150 to 250 ms after sound onset; and an inhibitory component onsetting at 250 ms. Only the facilitatory component was affected in patients with LPFC damage: this component was absent when attending to sounds delivered in the ear contralateral to the lesion, with the most prominent decreases observed over the damaged brain regions. These findings have 2 important implications: (i) they provide evidence for functionally distinct facilitatory and inhibitory mechanisms supporting late auditory selective attention; (ii) they show that the LPFC is involved in the control of the facilitatory mechanisms of auditory attention.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4626830 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu131 | DOI Listing |
Brain Behav
September 2025
Brain Stimulation and Rehabilitation (BrainStAR) Lab, School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Western Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Background: Corticomotor adaptations are believed to contribute to persistent pain. However, prior reviews have lacked sufficient data to adequately explore these adaptations in lower limb pain. This restricts the generalizability of existing research given the distinct functional and neurophysiological differences between upper and lower limb musculature.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPain
August 2025
Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM), the change in pain evoked by a test stimulus at 1 body site by a conditioning stimulus at another site, varies across individuals, ranging from inhibition (pain decreases) to no CPM to facilitation (pain increases). Given the role of alpha oscillations in pain, we examined the relationship between CPM and peak alpha frequency (PAF) and power in the dynamic pain connectome (DPC). In 68 healthy individuals who underwent resting-state magnetoencephalography and a heat-based CPM evaluation, 32% had inhibitory CPM, 49% had facilitatory CPM, and 19% had no CPM.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiomolecules
August 2025
Department of Earth, Environment and Life Sciences, University of Genova, Viale Benedetto XV 5, 16132 Genova, Italy.
The ability of the neuropeptide oxytocin to affect glial cell function is receiving increasing attention. We previously reported that oxytocin at a low nanomolar concentration could inhibit both astrocytic Ca signals and glutamate release. Here, we investigate the ability of oxytocin receptors to couple both inhibitory and stimulatory pathways in astrocytes, as already reported in neurons.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImaging Neurosci (Camb)
October 2024
Faculty of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
The present meta-analysis investigated the impact of non-invasive stimulation, using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) targeting the posterior cerebellum, on social and emotional mentalizing about others. Prior research has convincingly shown that the posterior cerebellum supports social and emotional cognition. We identified 14 studies targeting the cerebellum with appropriate control conditions (i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBrain Res Bull
July 2025
Department of Human Sciences, Institute of Psychology, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, Neubiberg 85577, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, Regensburg 93053, Germany.
Objective: Neuromodulatory changes induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) are highly variable and lack replicability. Amongst many influencing factors, the current direction of the stimulation is known to affect rTMS aftereffects. In this study, we investigated the influence of current direction on cortical and peripheral markers of motor cortex plasticity as induced by 1 Hz rTMS as well as the correlation of cortical and peripheral markers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF