Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Accumulating empirical evidence suggests a role of Bayesian inference and learning for shaping neural responses in auditory and visual perception. However, its relevance for somatosensory processing is unclear. In the present study we test the hypothesis that cortical somatosensory processing exhibits dynamics that are consistent with Bayesian accounts of brain function. Specifically, we investigate the cortical encoding of Bayesian surprise, a recently proposed marker of Bayesian perceptual learning, using EEG data recorded from 15 subjects. Capitalizing on a somatosensory mismatch roving paradigm, we performed computational single-trial modeling of evoked somatosensory potentials for the entire peri-stimulus time period in source space. By means of Bayesian model selection, we find that, at 140 ms post-stimulus onset, secondary somatosensory cortex represents Bayesian surprise rather than stimulus change, which is the conventional marker of EEG mismatch responses. In contrast, at 250 ms, right inferior frontal cortex indexes stimulus change. Finally, at 360 ms, our analyses indicate additional perceptual learning attributable to medial cingulate cortex. In summary, the present study provides novel evidence for anatomical-temporal/functional segregation in human somatosensory processing that is consistent with the Bayesian brain hypothesis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.050DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bayesian surprise
12
somatosensory processing
12
bayesian
8
encoding bayesian
8
consistent bayesian
8
perceptual learning
8
stimulus change
8
somatosensory
6
evidence neural
4
neural encoding
4

Similar Publications

Bayesian models describe precision (inverse variance) as a key determinant of perception. However, there is limited evidence on the behavioural effects of precision. The default assumption is that higher precision leads to greater surprise (or perceived change) from otherwise equivalent sensory changes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Eukaryotic gene regulation is based on stochastic yet controlled promoter switching, during which genes transition between transcriptionally active and inactive states. Despite the molecular complexity of this process, recent studies reveal a surprising invariance of the "switching correlation time" ($T_C$), which characterizes promoter activity fluctuations, across gene expression levels in diverse genes and organisms. A biophysically plausible explanation for this invariance remains missing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

What you see depends on what you have seen before, and commonly your perception is drawn toward the past. Such attractive biases, known as serial dependence, are well established for many visual features. Interestingly, Chen and Bae (2024, Cognition) recently reported a repulsive serial bias in a pointing direction estimation task that switched to an attractive one in the presence of a distracting task.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Information processing is a core element of cognitive processes in the brain. Rooted in the idea postulated by John von Neumann that the stochasticity of neural operations might essentially be a reflection of the probabilistic nature of information, it can be argued that fluctuations in the complexity of the brain operations should reflect aspects of information processing activities undertaken to infer nuances embedded in the sensory data. The current study elucidates these aspects by examining the intricate relationship between information processing in the brain, reflected in the complexity of brain activities, and information-theoretical measures of uncertainty in the Bayesian models of sequence learning.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Epistemic emotions, such as curiosity and interest, drive the inquiry process. This study proposes a novel formulation of these emotions using two types of information gain derived from the principle of free energy minimization: Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD), representing free energy reduction through recognition, and Bayesian surprise (BS), representing free energy reduction via Bayesian updating. Conventional Gaussian models predict an infinite divergence in information gain (KLD and BS) as prediction error increases, which contradicts the known limits of human cognitive resources.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF