Objective: To analyze the factors associated with the need for tracheostomy after surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) and its implications for longitudinal outcomes.
Methods: This retrospective analysis of patients who underwent ATAAD repair from 2010 to 2020 focused on a comparison of patients who required a tracheostomy versus those who did not. Adjusted regression analysis and a classification and regression tree (CART) model were used to assess factors influencing the need for tracheostomy and its association with longitudinal survival.
Objective: Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality compared with routine cardiac surgical procedures. The German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A score has been recommended for use as a mortality risk-stratification tool in recent guidelines. We sought to externally validate this score in our local population.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Thorac Surg Short Rep
September 2024
Background: Intraoperative physiologic parameters could offer predictive utility in evaluating risk of adverse postoperative events yet are not included in current standard risk models. This study examined whether the inclusion of continuous intraoperative data improved machine learning model predictions for multiple outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting, including 30-day mortality, renal failure, reoperation, prolonged ventilation, and combined morbidity and mortality (MM).
Methods: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database features and risk scores were combined with retrospectively gathered continuous intraoperative data from patients.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med
December 2024
Background: There has been a significant increase in the utilization of non-mechanical valves in the aortic position over time. However, details in reinterventions after aortic root replacement (ARR) with non-mechanical prosthesis were limited in the literature, despite the potential importance of reinterventions in the lifetime management of aortic valve disease.
Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study, identifying all patients who underwent ARR with allograft, xenografts, and stented bioprosthetic valved conduit from 2010 to 2020.
Objective: Elderly patients are less likely to undergo surgery for an acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). This study aims to understand the risks of surgical treatment in patients 75 and older.
Methods: This was a retrospective study using an institutional database of patients who underwent ATAAD repair from 2007 to 2021.
Background: We sought to assess the effect of postoperative renal failure (RF) on outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) and identify predictors of chronic kidney disease (CKD) following ATAAD.
Methods: This retrospective single-center analysis included all adults with ATAAD from 2011 to 2023. Patients were stratified into RF and no RF groups.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
January 2025
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
October 2024
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
April 2025
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
February 2025
Objective: This study evaluates the impact of donor age on outcomes following donation after circulatory death heart transplantation.
Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried to analyze adult recipients who underwent isolated donation after circulatory heart transplantation from January 1, 2019, to September 30, 2023. The cohort was stratified into 2 groups according to donor age, where advanced donor age was defined as 40 years or more.
Background: This study evaluated the outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) supported with Impella 5.0 or 5.5 and identified risk factors for in-hospital mortality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
April 2024
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
April 2024
Ann Thorac Surg
April 2024
Background: Trileaflet aortic valve neocuspidization (AVN) using autologous pericardium (Ozaki procedure) is an emerging surgical treatment option for aortic valve diseases. Although excellent results have been reported from Japan, data pertaining to its use in the United States are sparse.
Methods: All adult patients who underwent AVN (AVN group) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with a bioprosthetic valve (SAVR group) between 2015 and 2022 were identified.
Am J Cardiol
February 2024
Objective: To quantitate the impact of heart donation after circulatory death (DCD) donor utilization on both waitlist and post-transplant outcomes in the United States.
Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried to identify all adult waitlisted and transplanted candidates between October 18, 2018, and December 31, 2022. Waitlisted candidates were stratified according to whether they had been approved for donation after brain death (DBD) offers only or also approved for DCD offers.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
October 2024
Objective: To compare outcomes of patients undergoing valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV TAVR) versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).
Methods: This was a retrospective study using institutional databases of transcatheter (2013-2022) and surgical (2011-2022) aortic valve replacements. Patients who underwent ViV TAVR were compared with patients who underwent redo isolated SAVR.
Background: Stentless aortic root replacement (ARR) and aortic root enlargement (ARE) are established strategies to avoid prosthesis-patient mismatch in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and small annuli. We sought to compare outcomes of these 2 procedures.
Methods: This was an observational study using an institutional database of aortic valve replacements from 2010 to 2021.
J Card Surg
December 2022
Introduction: There are no guidelines regarding the use of bovine pericardial or porcine valves for aortic valve replacement, and prior studies have yielded conflicting results. The current study sought to compare short- and long-term outcomes in propensity-matched cohorts of patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) with bovine versus porcine valves.
Methods: This was a retrospective study utilizing an institutional database of all isolated bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve replacements performed at our center from 2010 to 2020.