Publications by authors named "Michael Fix"

Background: Radiotherapy workflows conventionally deliver one treatment plan multiple times throughout the treatment course. Non-coplanar techniques with beam angle optimization or dosimetrically optimized pathfinding (DOP) exploit additional degrees of freedom to improve spatial conformality of the dose distribution compared to widely used techniques like volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The temporal dimension of dose delivery can be exploited using multiple plans (sub-plans) within one treatment course.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Manual contouring of organs at risk in radiotherapy is time-consuming, taking 1-4 hours per case. Automatic segmentation using deep learning has emerged as a promising solution, with many commercial options now available. However, these methods require rigorous validation before clinical use, and current evaluation approaches lack consistency and comprehensive assessment across publications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study aimed to show that table movement of dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) does not induce more motion sickness than standard-of-care non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (ncVMAT). Forty-one healthy volunteers underwent dry-runs of DTRT and ncVMAT in four different, randomly allocated sequences. The primary outcome was the Motion Sickness Assessment Questionnaire (MSAQ) summary score.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Purpose: Deformable image registration (DIR) enables advanced applications for image-guided and adaptive radiotherapy. However, DIR has not yet been widely adopted in clinical settings. This study addresses two challenges: (1) evaluating DIR practices and identifying barriers through a survey of Swiss radiotherapy institutes, providing Swiss-specific insights, and (2) assessing multi-institutional deformable-based dose accumulation (DDA) uncertainties by analyzing dose discrepancies on the accumulated dose.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Robustness assessment is an essential part of radiotherapy plan quality assessment. However, it is often not evaluated in photon-based radiotherapy. This study aims to conduct a robustness audit to establish a baseline for the role of plan robustness in Switzerland by assessing and comparing robustness across plans from and clinical workflows in multiple institutions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This work demonstrated the development of a fast, deep-learning framework (DeepSMCP) to mitigate noise in Monte Carlo dose distributions (MC-DDs) of photon treatment plans with high statistical uncertainty (SU) and its integration into the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan (SMCP). To this end, a two-channel input (MC-DD and computed tomography (CT) scan) 3D U-net was trained, validated and tested (80%/10%/10%) on high/low-SU MC-DD-pairs of 106 clinically-motivated VMAT arcs for 29 available CTs, augmented to 3074 pairs. The model was integrated into SMCP to enable a "one-click" workflow of calculating and denoising MC-DDs of high SU to obtain MC-DDs of low SU.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Non-coplanarity and mixed beam modality could be combined to further enhance dosimetric treatment plan quality. We introduce dynamic mixed beam arc therapy (DYMBARC) as an innovative technique that combines non-coplanar photon and electron arcs, dynamic gantry and collimator rotations, and intensity modulation with photon multileaf collimator (MLC). However, finding favorable beam directions for DYMBARC is challenging due to the large solution space, machine component constraints, and optimization parameters, posing a highly non-convex optimization problem.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Dose calculation in radiotherapy aims to accurately estimate and assess the dose distribution of a treatment plan. Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation is considered the gold standard owing to its ability to accurately simulate particle transport in inhomogeneous media. However, uncertainties such as the patient's dynamically deforming anatomy can still lead to differences between the delivered and planned dose distribution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Non-isocentric dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) is a new way to target radiation therapy that uses special movements of the machine to hit the tumor from different angles without being stuck in one spot.
  • Researchers are creating a technique that helps decide the best path for the radiation beams, making sure they avoid healthy organs while still reaching the tumor effectively.
  • Comparisons of different treatment plans show that this new method can give better radiation distribution to the tumor and lower the radiation dose to nearby healthy organs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) and dynamic mixed-beam arc therapy (DYMBARC) exploit non-coplanarity and, for DYMBARC, simultaneously optimized photon and electron beams. Margin concepts to account for set-up uncertainties during delivery are ill-defined for electron fields. We develop robust optimization for DTRT&DYMBARC and compare dosimetric plan quality and robustness for both techniques and both optimization strategies for four cases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This article examines the critical role of fast Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations in advancing proton therapy techniques, particularly in the context of increasing treatment customization and precision. As adaptive radiotherapy and other patient-specific approaches evolve, the need for accurate and precise dose calculations, essential for techniques like proton-based stereotactic radiosurgery, becomes more prominent. These calculations, however, are time-intensive, with the treatment planning/optimization process constrained by the achievable speed of dose computations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Purpose: Dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) has been shown to improve healthy tissue sparing compared to volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). This study aimed to assess and compare the robustness of DTRT and VMAT treatment-plans for head and neck (H&N) cancer to patient-setup (PS) and machine-positioning uncertainties.

Materials And Methods: The robustness of DTRT and VMAT plans previously created for 46 H&N cases, prescribed 50-70 Gy to 95 % of the planning-target-volume, was assessed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We compared dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) to state-of-the-art volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for 46 head and neck cancer cases. DTRT had lower dose to salivary glands and swallowing structure, resulting in lower predicted xerostomia and dysphagia compared to VMAT. DTRT is deliverable on C-arm linacs with high dosimetric accuracy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

. Water-equivalent dosimeters are desirable for dosimetry in radiotherapy. The present work investigates basic characteristics of novel aqueous detector materials and presents a signal loss approach for electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) dosimetry.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Non-coplanar techniques have shown to improve the achievable dose distribution compared to standard coplanar techniques for multiple treatment sites but finding optimal beam directions is challenging. Dynamic collimator trajectory radiotherapy (colli-DTRT) is a new intensity modulated radiotherapy technique that uses non-coplanar partial arcs and dynamic collimator rotation.

Purpose: To solve the beam angle optimization (BAO) problem for colli-DTRT and non-coplanar VMAT (NC-VMAT) by determining the table-angle and the gantry-angle ranges of the partial arcs through iterative 4π fluence map optimization (FMO) and beam direction elimination.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Modern radiotherapy techniques often deliver small radiation fields. In this work, a practical Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) dosimetry protocol is adapted and applied to measure output factors (OF) in small fields of a 6 MV radiotherapy system. Correction factors and uncertainties are presented and OFs are compared to the values obtained by following TRS-483 using an ionization chamber (IC).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

. Electron arcs in mixed-beam radiotherapy (Arc-MBRT) consisting of intensity-modulated electron arcs with dynamic gantry rotation potentially reduce the delivery time compared to mixed-beam radiotherapy containing electron beams with static gantry angle (Static-MBRT). This study aims to develop and investigate a treatment planning process (TPP) for photon multileaf collimator (pMLC) based Arc-MBRT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Non-coplanar radiotherapy treatment techniques on C-arm linear accelerators have the potential to reduce dose to organs-at-risk in comparison with coplanar treatment techniques. Accurately predicting possible collisions between gantry, table and patient during treatment planning is needed to ensure patient safety. We offer a freely available collision prediction tool using Blender, a free and open-source 3D computer graphics software toolset.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To improve organ at risk (OAR) sparing, dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) extends VMAT by dynamic table and collimator rotation during beam-on. However, comprehensive investigations regarding the impact of the gantry-table (GT) rotation gradient on the DTRT plan quality have not been conducted.

Purpose: To investigate the impact of a user-defined GT rotation gradient on plan quality of DTRT plans in terms of dosimetric plan quality, dosimetric robustness, deliverability, and delivery time.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) extends state-of-the-art volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) by dynamic table and collimator rotations during beam-on. The effects of intrafraction motion during DTRT delivery are unknown, especially regarding the possible interplay between patient and machine motion with additional dynamic axes.

Purpose: To experimentally assess the technical feasibility and quantify the mechanical and dosimetric accuracy of respiratory gating during DTRT delivery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: To save time and have more consistent contours, fully automatic segmentation of targets and organs at risk (OAR) is a valuable asset in radiotherapy. Though current deep learning (DL) based models are on par with manual contouring, they are not perfect and typical errors, as false positives, occur frequently and unpredictably. While it is possible to solve this for OARs, it is far from straightforward for target structures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) extends volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with dynamic table and collimator rotation during beam-on. The aim of the study is to establish DTRT path-finding strategies, demonstrate deliverability and dosimetric accuracy and compare DTRT to state-of-the-art VMAT for common head and neck (HN) cancer cases.

Methods: A publicly available library of seven HN cases was created on an anthropomorphic phantom with all relevant organs-at-risk (OARs) delineated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Purpose: To assess the feasibility of postoperative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for patients with hybrid implants consisting of carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone and titanium (CFP-T) using CyberKnife.

Materials And Methods: All essential steps within a radiation therapy (RT) workflow were evaluated. First, the contouring process of target volumes and organs at risk (OAR) was done for patients with CFP-T implants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Evaluating plan robustness is a key step in radiotherapy.

Purpose: To develop a flexible Monte Carlo (MC)-based robustness calculation and evaluation tool to assess and quantify dosimetric robustness of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans by exploring the impact of systematic and random uncertainties resulting from patient setup, patient anatomy changes, and mechanical limitations of machine components.

Methods: The robustness tool consists of two parts: the first part includes automated MC dose calculation of multiple user-defined uncertainty scenarios to populate a robustness space.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF