Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
This study aimed to show that table movement of dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) does not induce more motion sickness than standard-of-care non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (ncVMAT). Forty-one healthy volunteers underwent dry-runs of DTRT and ncVMAT in four different, randomly allocated sequences. The primary outcome was the Motion Sickness Assessment Questionnaire (MSAQ) summary score. The average change in MSAQ summary score before to after dry-runs was 1.88 for DTRT and 1.62 for ncVMAT. The difference between both techniques was 0.26 [95% CI: -0.24 to 0.75]; the CI demonstrated non-inferiority of DTRT to ncVMAT for motion sickness in healthy volunteers.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226396 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2025.100796 | DOI Listing |