Lancet
April 2025
Background: Colonoscopy and the faecal immunochemical test are accepted strategies for colorectal cancer screening in the average-risk population (ie, people aged ≥50 years without personal or family history of colorectal cancer). In this trial, we aimed to compare whether invitation to screening with faecal immunochemical test was non-inferior to colonoscopy in a screening programme.
Methods: COLONPREV was a pragmatic, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial done at 15 tertiary hospitals across eight regions of Spain.
Background/aim: Stage migration, a phenomenon triggered by technological advancements allowing more sensitive tumor spread detection, results in alterations in the distribution of cancer stages within a population. Canine multicentric lymphoma is staged I to V based on the affected anatomic site(s) and substage a or b depending on the presence of tumor-related clinical signs. The primary objective of this study was to assess the influence of various diagnostic techniques on staging accuracy and determine whether multiple staging methods lead to significant stage migration, impacting the reliability of disease stage assignments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe objective of this study is to evaluate interval cancer (IC) in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, which is CRC diagnosed in an individual after having received a negative faecal occult blood test and before the next invitation to participate in screening. A follow-up study was conducted on a cohort of participants in the first three screening rounds of four colorectal cancer screening programmes in Spain, = 664,993. A total of 321 ICs and 2120 screen-detected cancers (SCs) were found.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnited European Gastroenterol J
November 2022
Background And Objective: Different factors may influence colonoscopy performance measures. We aimed to analyze procedure- and endoscopist-related factors associated with detection of colorectal lesions and whether these factors have a similar influence in the context of different colonoscopy indications: positive fecal immunochemical test (+FIT) and post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopies.
Methods: This multicenter cross-sectional study included adults aged 40-80 years.
Background: Patients with multiple or large adenomas are considered to be high-risk for metachronous colorectal cancer.
Objective: Evaluate the risks of detecting colorectal cancer, advanced adenoma, and advanced serrated polyps at 1-year surveillance colonoscopy in patients with >5 adenomas or adenomas >20 mm.
Design: Descriptive, retrospective, multicentric, cohort study.
Using the algorithm of the World Endoscopy Organisation (WEO), we have studied retrospectively all colorectal cancers, both detected and non-detected by the Basque Country screening programme from 2009 to 2017. In the screening programme 61,335 colonoscopies were performed following a positive Faecal Immunochemical test (FIT) (≥20 µg Hb/g faeces) and the 128 cases of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) detected were analysed. Among them, 50 interval type PCCRCs were diagnosed (before the recommended surveillance), 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFColorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs have been implemented to reduce the burden of the disease. When an advanced colonic lesion is detected, clinical practice guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance with different intervals between explorations. Endoscopic surveillance is producing a considerable increase in the number of colonoscopies, with a limited effect on the CRC incidence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: High participation determines the success of colorectal cancer screening programmes in reducing incidence and mortality. The factors that determine participation must be studied from the perspective of professionals that implement the programme. The aim was to identify factors that facilitate or hinder the participation of the invited people in the bowel cancer screening programme of the Basque Country (Spain) from professional's perspective.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIn the fecal immunological test, a suitable cut-off value may be selected to classify results as either positive or negative. Our aim is to estimate the optimal cut-off value for detecting colorectal cancer in different age and sex groups. This is a multicentric retrospective cohort study of participants in CRC screening programs with FIT between 2006 and 2012.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: The Basque Government (Spain) approved a population based Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme in 2008 with its base on Primary Healthcare. Since then, a coverage of 100% of the population and an average participation rate of 68.4% have been achieved.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes require high levels of participation in order to reduce mortality. To improve participation rates, it is necessary to identify the health risk factors and social inequalities associated with non-participation.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted between June and September of 2019 in six databases: CINHAL, Medline, Scopus, Social Sciences Citation Index, Embase and PsycINFO.
Unlabelled: Population screening has improved early diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). Nonetheless, most cases are diagnosed in symptomatic patients. Faecal immunochemical testing has been recommended for assessing patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms, but whether it improves patient survival is unknown.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWorld J Gastroenterol
July 2020
Background: The results obtained to date concerning food groups, diet quality and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk vary according to criteria used and the study populations.
Aim: To study the relationships between food groups, diet quality and CRC risk, in an adult population of the Basque Country (North of Spain).
Methods: This observational study included 308 patients diagnosed with CRC and 308 age- and sex-matched subjects as controls.
Epidemiologic studies have revealed inconsistent evidence of gene-diet interaction in relation to colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to analyze them in a sample of cases and controls from the population-based bowel cancer screening program of the Osakidetza/Basque Health Service. This study analyzed dietetic, genetic, demographic, socioeconomic factors and lifestyles.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnited European Gastroenterol J
March 2021
Background: There is already evidence that the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a useful tool for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) that helps to identify symptomatic patients requiring early colonoscopy. Although the recommendation to use FIT is widely accepted, there are no data concerning whether this strategy improves patient survival.The objective was to assess whether the survival is higher if CRC patients have been first diagnosed by FIT (as compared with the rest of patients with CRC).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Public Health
June 2020
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major public health problem due to its incidence and mortality. Screening programmes help decrease its impact on the population through early detection. However, the uneven distribution of social determinants of health can cause inequalities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFI have carried out an in depth reading of the article by Cobo-Cuenca et al 2019 [...
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGiven the significant population diversity in genetic variation, we aimed to investigate whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously identified in studies of colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility were also relevant to the population of the Basque Country (North of Spain). We genotyped 230 CRC cases and 230 healthy controls for 48 previously reported CRC-susceptibility SNPs. Only the rs6687758 in DUPS10 exhibited a statistically significant association with CRC risk based on the crude analysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: This study compared the participation in four faecal immunochemical testing-based screening programmes for colorectal cancer in Flanders, France, Basque country and the Netherlands, to identify factors to further optimize faecal immunochemical testing programmes.
Method: Background information and data on performance indicators were collected and compared for the four programmes.
Results: Invitation method, reminders, funding, faecal immunochemical testing cut-off and follow-up after positive faecal immunochemical testing differed in the four programmes.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
May 2020
Background & Aims: Most fulfillment and benchmarking information for colonoscopy quality indicators has been obtained from studies of primary screening colonoscopies. We analyzed differences in the fulfillment of colonoscopy quality indicators based on the indication for endoscopy.
Methods: We performed an observational, multicenter, cross-sectional study of 14,867 patients who underwent endoscopy procedures for gastrointestinal symptoms (40.
Severe complications (SC) in colonoscopy represent the most important adverse effect of colorectal cancer screening programs (CRCSP). The objective is to evaluate the risk factors for SC in colonoscopy indicated after a positive fecal occult blood test in population-based CRCSP. The SC (n = 161) identified from 48,730 diagnostic colonoscopies performed in a cohort of all the women and men invited from 2000 to 2012 in 6 CRCSP in Spain.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTo compare the quality of colonoscopy in a population-based coordinated program of colorectal cancer screening according to type of hospital (academic or non-academic). Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy after positive FIT (≥ 20 ug Hb/g feces) between January 2009 and September 2016 were prospectively included at five academic and seven non-academic public hospitals. Screening colonoscopy quality indicators considered were adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, complications and bowel preparation quality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGastroenterol Hepatol
February 2019
Introduction: Colonoscopy is the diagnostic/therapeutic confirmation test for colorectal cancer. The monitoring of the experience of people who have undergone the test is interesting to improve the quality of the colonoscopy. The aim of the project was to study factors affecting patients' experience and their relationship with the quality indicators of the Clinical Practice Guidelines.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnited European Gastroenterol J
June 2018
Background: Screening by means of biennial fecal occult blood test has provided a reduction in overall colorectal cancer mortality. Notwithstanding, we should not underestimate the harms that it can produce.
Aim: The aim of this article is to identify the independent risk factors of complications after a screening colonoscopy.