[Involvement of the Primary Healthcare professionals in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme of the Basque Country.].

Rev Esp Salud Publica

Departamento de Matemática Aplciada. Estadística e Investigación Operativa. Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología. Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea UPV/EHU. Leioa. España.

Published: January 2021


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: The Basque Government (Spain) approved a population based Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme in 2008 with its base on Primary Healthcare. Since then, a coverage of 100% of the population and an average participation rate of 68.4% have been achieved. General Practitioners and nurses play a central role on its implementation. The aim of this work was to describe the characteristics, involvement and attitudes of the health professionals that implement the programme.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in Primary Healthcare to general practitioners and nurses between May and June of 2016. An ad-hoc online questionnaire was designed. The data included socio-demographic information and questions regarding their involvement on the programme.

Results: 1,216 health professionals answered the questionnaire, 50.7% were general practitioners and 49.3% nurses. 78% of the responders were women. The 75.8% considered the programme very important although differences were found between general practitioners and nurses. The 89% of the professionals attended training and 34% scientific workshops about screening at least once. There were differences between general practitioners and nurses on the attendance to the training and importance they give to the programme, and on their participation on workshops.

Conclusions: There is a high level of involvement of Primary Healthcare professionals in the programme as they consider it very important; this could be one of the keys for its success. The differences between professionals on their opinion and experience should be taken into account on its design, as they are the ones with a closer contact with the population.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

general practitioners
20
primary healthcare
16
practitioners nurses
16
healthcare professionals
8
colorectal cancer
8
cancer screening
8
screening programme
8
health professionals
8
differences general
8
professionals
6

Similar Publications

Introduction: In various countries, an increasing proportion of general practitioner (GP) referrals is returned by hospitals. We aimed to uncover the causes and consequences of referral returns from the perspective of GP liaisons.

Methods: Individual interviews with 20 GP liaison officers from various departments in Southern Denmark, serving 1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Acupuncture Safety in Diabetic Limb: A Scoping Review.

Med Acupunct

August 2025

Acupuncture Service, Pain Management Centre, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Background: Any injury to the diabetic limbs may portent disastrous consequences. However, it is not uncommon for diabetics to also seek complementary and alternative medicine for treatment, such as acupuncture. There are limited data on infective or ulcerative adverse events regarding acupuncture in diabetic limbs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Tumor deposit (TD) is an independent risk factor associated with recurrence or metastasis for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The scenario in which both TD and lymph node metastasis (LNM) are positive is not clearly illustrated by the current TNM staging system. Simply treating one TD as one or two LNMs by a weighting factor is inappropriate.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Schizophrenia spectrum stigma in healthcare: a systematic review.

Front Psychiatry

August 2025

Department of Psychology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.

Introduction: Within healthcare settings, schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD) stigma is pervasive and presents significant barriers to recovery and equitable care. Understanding the sources, nature, and moderators of such stigma among healthcare providers is essential for informing targeted interventions.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of 44 peer-reviewed studies examining SSD-related stigma among diverse healthcare providers, including trainees, nurses, general practitioners, psychiatrists, psychologists, and community health workers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background Subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) in pregnancy poses serious maternal and fetal risks, including miscarriage, gestational diabetes, and neurodevelopmental impairment. Despite clear international guidelines like those from the American Thyroid Association (ATA), global practice remains inconsistent. In Saudi Arabia, where SCH prevalence among pregnant women is notably high (13%), there is limited national data on how closely physicians follow these guidelines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF