Publications by authors named "Gaurav Upadhyay"

Background: In recent years, there has been a surge of interest in strategies to perform conduction system pacing (CSP). Of these, left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has rapidly gained popularity as the preferred approach to perform CSP due to favorable pacing thresholds and greater perceived ease of implant.

Aim: The majority of initial descriptions of LBBAP has focused on use of lumenless pacing leads.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The field of cardiac pacing has changed dramatically since the first pacemakers were implanted in the 1950s. Over the ensuing decades, advancements in pacing technology have yielded longer battery life, smaller devices, sturdier leads, and more sophisticated pacemaker programming. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) represented a significant revolution in pacing approach, with the goal of correcting interventricular dyssynchrony through biventricular pacing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cardioneural ablation (CNA) shows promise as a viable alternative to permanent cardiac pacing and pharmacotherapy for patients with symptomatic functional bradycardia and debilitating vasovagal syncope (VVS). The evidence supporting a potential therapeutic role for CNA is limited by relatively small sample sizes from predominantly single-center reports.

Objectives: This study sought to report the feasibility, safety, and clinical efficacy of CNA from a large, first-ever multicenter US registry.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Leadless pacemakers have transformed pacing by reducing risk for infection and lead-related complications. The feasibility of achieving leadless Bachmann's bundle area pacing (BBAP) for atrial resynchronization is not known.

First-in-human Summary: A 49-year-old woman with sinus node dysfunction and interatrial conduction delay underwent leadless atrial pacemaker targeting Bachmann's bundle (BB).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BVP) is an established treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and wide QRS. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a physiologic alternative by directly engaging the His-Purkinje system, potentially improving electrical resynchronization and clinical outcomes.

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the clinical outcomes between BVP and LBBAP in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤50% undergoing CRT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Traditional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BVP) may be less effective in patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (NIVCD). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) combined with left ventricular (LV) coronary venous lead pacing (LOT-CRT) may be more effective in these patients.

Objective: We assessed the echocardiographic response of LOT-CRT in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) or NIVCD and compared it with a propensity-matched BVP cohort.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The association between particulate matter (PM) air pollution and ventricular arrhythmias is not well established. In patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), publicly available day-level air pollution data provide a unique opportunity to study acute and subacute effects of PM pollution.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of air pollution with ventricular arrhythmias, physical activity, and CIED markers of heart failure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has been rapidly adopted despite a lack of leads with approved indications for LBBAP.

Objective: This study aims to analyze the performance of a 6Fr active fixation, stylet-driven lead in LBBAP.

Methods: The multicenter INSIGHT-LBBA registry analyzed consecutive LBBAP implant attempts with INGEVITY+ leads.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Permanent implantation of a DF-4 implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) lead in the left bundle branch area (LBBA-ICD) is the next paradigm in amalgamating cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and defibrillation. We systematically investigated feasibility/success rate, procedural caveats, and complications associated with a permanent DF-4 LBBA ICD implant and pertinent data at short-term follow-up.

Methods: We prospectively attempted implantation of 7 Fr Durata (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) single coil DF-4 ICD lead at the LBBA using a fixed-curve non-deflectable CPS locator delivery sheath.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Inappropriate therapy (IAT) is a significant issue associated with implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapy, particularly highlighted in early subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) studies which showed high rates of inappropriate shocks (IAS).
  • The PRAETORIAN trial, an international study with 849 patients, found no major differences in IAT and IAS rates between S-ICD and transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) groups, as both groups had similar cumulative incidences.
  • Key predictors for IAT varied between the two groups, with TV-ICD patients experiencing IAT mainly from supraventricular tachycardias, while S-ICD patients faced issues from cardiac oversensing
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The atrial electroanatomic substrate is an essential component in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the electrophysiological markers of susceptible atria for AF are not well-characterized. This study aimed to assess atrial conduction indices on surface electrocardiogram (ECG) and intracardiac electrogram (EGM) as predictors of initiation and recurrence of AF after successful ablation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The S-ICD was created to eliminate lead-related issues found in the TV-ICD, as it is an external device that sits under the skin rather than using leads inside the body.
  • This analysis comes from the PRAETORIAN trial, where patients were randomly assigned to either S-ICD or TV-ICD and assessed for quality of life through various questionnaires at different stages.
  • Results showed no significant differences in physical and mental well-being between the groups, but patients who experienced a shock recently reported lower social functioning and emotional health compared to those who did not.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is being examined as a potential alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP) for patients needing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), with a study comparing the two along with left bundle-optimized therapy CRT (LOT-CRT).
  • In the study involving 48 patients, LOT-CRT and BVP showed significantly greater increases in left ventricular pressure and QRS shortening compared to unipolar and bipolar LBBAP, indicating better hemodynamic performance.
  • Results also suggested that patients with interventricular conduction delay had less QRS reduction but similar improvements in left ventricular pressure compared to those with left bundle branch block, and the effectiveness of combining LBBAP with coronary vein
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a guideline-recommended therapy in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF, 36%-50%) and left bundle branch block or indication for ventricular pacing. Conduction system pacing (CSP) using left bundle branch area pacing or His bundle pacing has been shown to be a safe and physiologic alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP).

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between BVP and CSP for patients with HFmrEF undergoing CRT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The impact of varying rates of pacemapping (PM) rates on QRS morphology and PM score matching in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) has not been systematically assessed.

Objectives: In this study, the authors sought to assess the variability in PM score matching at different pacing rates.

Methods: During substrate mapping for VT ablation, PM was performed at cycle lengths (CLs) of 600 ms, 500 ms, 400 ms, 300 ms, and VT CL.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The benefit of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is well established; its efficacy in patients with heart failure preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less clear.

Objective: The objective of the study was to compare AF and heart failure (HF) rehospitalizations after PVI in patients with HFpEF vs HFrEF.

Methods: The IBM MarketScan Database was used to identify patients undergoing PVI for AF.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: There is a paucity of data comparing conduction system pacing (CSP) to biventricular pacing (BiVP) in patients with heart failure (HF) with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Objective: Compare the clinical outcomes of patients with mid-range LVEF undergoing CSP versus BiVP.

Methods: Patients with mid-range LVEF (> 35 to 50%) undergoing CSP or BiVP were retrospectively identified.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study investigates the effects of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines on the incidence of atrial arrhythmias (AAs) and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), using data from BIOTRONIK and Medicare.
  • It found a statistically significant but small increase in AAs in the three months after the first COVID-19 vaccination compared to the previous three months, which was similar to increases noted after receiving the influenza vaccine.
  • The researchers concluded that the observed rise in AAs is likely related to the progression of atrial fibrillation rather than the vaccine itself, suggesting that monitoring for AAs is especially important for older males post-vaccination.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Shock-reduction implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming (SRP) was associated with fewer therapies and improved survival in randomized controlled trials, but real-world studies investigating SRP and associated outcomes are limited.

Methods And Results: The BIOTRONIK CERTITUDE registry was linked with the Medicare database. We included all patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implanted between August 22, 2012 and September 30, 2021 in the United States.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Synopsis of recent research by authors named "Gaurav Upadhyay"

  • - Gaurav Upadhyay's recent research primarily investigates the differences in inappropriate therapy and shock rates between subcutaneous and transvenous implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs), highlighting their safety and efficacy.
  • - His article, stemming from a secondary analysis of the PRAETORIAN trial, contends that the subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) presents a noninferior performance compared to the transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) concerning inappropriate shocks and associated complications.
  • - The findings underscore the potential of S-ICDs as an effective alternative in cardiac therapy, addressing concerns over inappropriate shocks that have historically limited their adoption in clinical practice.