97 results match your criteria: "VUI Center for Outcomes Research[Affiliation]"
Int Urol Nephrol
August 2024
VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
Purpose: We aimed to assess the appropriateness of ChatGPT in providing answers related to prostate cancer (PCa) screening, comparing GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.
Methods: A committee of five reviewers designed 30 questions related to PCa screening, categorized into three difficulty levels.
Int J Urol
May 2024
VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Objectives: To analyze the generalizability of the Göteborg-2 findings to a North American cohort.
Methods: We replicated the Göteborg-2 inclusion criteria in our Henry Ford Health (HFH) cohort, by identifying all patients 50-60 years old who had a PSA test from 2013 to 2018. The first PSA within the study period was considered PSA at entry, and included in the analysis.
Urology
February 2024
VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI. Electronic address:
Objective: To assess the incidence, cumulative healthcare burden, and financial impact of inpatient admissions for radiation cystitis (RC), while exploring practice differences in RC management between teaching and nonteaching hospitals.
Methods: We focused on 19,613 patients with a diagnosis of RC within the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2008 to 2014. ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes were used.
BJU Int
May 2024
VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Urol Pract
November 2023
VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Introduction: This study sought to examine PSA testing rates before, early in, and later in the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: Our cohort included test results from men >45 years who received PSA testing at least once at our institution from November 2018 to September 2021 and were alive at the end of that period. Monthly trends were evaluated for 3 periods: pre-COVID (November 2018-February 2020), early-COVID (March-May 2020), and late-COVID (June 2020-September 2021).
Urol Pract
September 2023
VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Introduction: Limited data exist on trends in PSA screening in men with a family history of prostate cancer. The aims of our study were to (1) study age-stratified temporal trends in PSA screening from 2000-2018 for men with a family history of prostate cancer and Black men with a family history of prostate cancer, and (2) identify determinants associated with receipt of PSA screening in the aforementioned groups.
Methods: We identified men aged ≥40 years without a prior history of prostate cancer using data from National Health Interview Survey 2000-2018 who self-reported PSA testing in the last 12 months.
Urology
July 2021
VUI Center for Outcomes Research Analytics and Evaluation, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI. Electronic address:
World J Urol
September 2021
VUI Center for Outcomes Research Analytics and Evaluation, Senior staff, Vattikuti Urology Institute (VUI), Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202-2689, USA.
Objective: To externally validate a Genomic Classifier (GC) based risk-stratification nomogram identifying candidates who would benefit from adjuvant radiation (aRT) therapy after radical prostatectomy (RP).
Methods: We identified 350 patients who underwent RP, between 2013 and 2018, and had adverse pathological features (positive margin, and/or pT3a or higher) on final pathology. Genomic profile was available for all these men.
Urology
February 2021
VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI. Electronic address:
Eur Urol Oncol
May 2019
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Context: There is uncertainty regarding the oncologic effectiveness and the survival advantage of local treatment (LT) in men with clinically lymph node-positive (cN+) prostate cancer (PCa).
Objective: To systematically review the current literature comparing oncologic outcomes associated with the use of any form of LT for PCa patients with cN+ disease.
Evidence Acquisition: A computerized bibliographic search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed for all studies reporting comparative oncologic outcomes of LT±androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) versus ADT alone.
Urol Pract
May 2019
Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Introduction: Accountable care organizations are designed to financially incentivize efficiency and reduce low value care. To determine if accountable care organizations have impacted prostate cancer screening patterns, we analyzed trends in prostate specific antigen screening and prostate biopsies by accountable care organization and nonaccountable care organization providers.
Methods: Using a random 20% sample of Medicare claims, we selected men 66 years old or older.
JAMA Oncol
November 2018
VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Clin Genitourin Cancer
February 2019
Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Background: The rate of noninterventional treatment (NIT) in prostate cancer (PCa) active surveillance (AS) candidates is on the rise. However, contemporary data are unavailable. We described community-based NIT rates within 16 Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries between 2010 and 2014.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Urol
August 2018
VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Urol Oncol
May 2018
Division of Urological Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Electronic address:
Objectives: Healthcare for racial minorities is densely concentrated at a small subset of hospitals in the United States. Understanding long-term outcomes at these minority-serving hospitals is highly relevant to elucidating the sources of racial disparities in cancer care. We investigated the effect of treatment at a minority-serving hospital on overall survival and receipt of definitive treatment for bladder cancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Urol Focus
May 2019
Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada; Department of Urology, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Background: Historically, partial nephrectomy (PN) showed no benefit on other-cause mortality (OCM) in elderly patients with small renal masses.
Objective: To test the effect of PN versus radical nephrectomy (RN) on OCM, cancer-specific mortality (CSM), as well as 30-d mortality in patients with nonmetastatic T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC), aged ≥75 yr old.
Design, Setting, And Participants: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry (2004-2014), we identified surgically treated patients with nonmetastatic pT1a RCC aged ≥75 yr.
Eur Urol Focus
May 2019
Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Background: Aborted radical prostatectomy (aRP) in lymph node (LN) metastatic (pN1) prostate cancer (PCa) patients showed worse survival in European patients. Contemporary rates of aRP are unknown in North America.
Objective: To examine the rate of aRP and its effect on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in contemporary North American patients.
Eur Urol Focus
May 2019
Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Background: We hypothesized that a cut-off in positive lymph node (LN) counts may discriminate between cancer-specific mortality (CSM) rates in clinically localized prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP).
Objective: To test this relationship, we relied on different LN count cut-offs, as well as the continuously coded number of positive LNs (NPN).
Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2014), we identified patients with D'Amico intermediate- or high-risk characteristics who underwent RP and pelvic LN dissection, regardless of pathologic LN stage.
Eur Urol
February 2018
VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
BJU Int
April 2018
Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Objectives: To perform a head-to-head comparison of four nomograms; namely, the Cagiannos, the 2012-Briganti, the Godoy and the online-Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), for prediction of lymph node invasion (LNI) in a North American population.
Patients And Methods: A total of 19 775 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) who had undergone radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) were identified within the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. All four nomograms were tested using Heagerty's concordance index (C-index), calibration plots and decision curve analysis (DCA).
Cancer
January 2018
Division of Urological Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Background: This study assessed the use of active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer and evaluated institutional factors associated with the receipt of active surveillance.
Methods: A retrospective, hospital-based cohort of 115,208 men with low-risk prostate cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 was used. Multivariate and mixed effects models were used to examine variation and factors associated with active surveillance.
Urol Pract
September 2017
Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Introduction: Cystectomy is a first line treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer and a last resort option for several benign bladder conditions. It is currently unknown how the perioperative outcomes of cystectomy for cancer differ from those of cystectomy for benign conditions.
Methods: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database we extracted data on cystectomy between 2006 and 2013.
J Urol
November 2017
VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Eur Urol Focus
January 2019
VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA. Electronic address:
Studies have noted contrasting findings with regard to the contemporary incidence of metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) in the USA, especially in light of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in recent years. We used data from the 18 population- based tumor registries of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) 2004-2013 database to study trends in the incidence of metastatic PCa among men stratified by age and race. Joinpoint regression analyses were performed to identify time points associated with any statistically significant change in incidence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Urol Focus
December 2018
Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Urology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA. Electronic address:
Context: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most complex urological procedures performed. Higher surgical volume has been found previously to be associated with better patient outcomes and reduced costs to the health care system. This has resulted in some regionalization of care toward high-volume facilities and providers; however, the preponderance of RPs is still performed at low-volume institutions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF