86 results match your criteria: "Clinical Imaging Physics Group[Affiliation]"
J Ultrasound Med
July 2025
Radiation Safety, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Objectives: Periodic quality control (QC) testing of ultrasound (US) imaging systems is essential to ensure and maintain image quality and safety. The study aims to analyze QC findings from medical physics annual surveys of modern clinical US systems in a multi-institutional survey.
Methods: QC results from annual surveys between 2018 and 2021 were retrospectively collected from 12 medical physicists from 11 institutions or consulting companies (hereafter referred to as sites).
Phys Med
August 2025
Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Labs, Clinical Imaging Physics Group, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Departments of Radiology, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, and Physics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA. Electronic address: eh
Purpose: To develop and characterize individualized dose and quality measures at organ level compared to their generic counterparts across a clinical CT dataset.
Materials And Methods: The study included 9801 chest-abdomen-pelvis and abdomen-pelvis CT exams (7,763 patients, mean age, 56 ± 17 years; 4113 women) representing 20 unique protocols. For each exam, patient-specific organ dose of all radiosensitive organs was estimated using a validated method by generating personalized computational phantoms and Monte Carlo simulations.
Med Phys
January 2025
Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Diagnostics (Basel)
July 2024
Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Rosenbühlgasse 27, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
To determine the diagnostic performance of simulated reduced-dose chest CT scans regarding pulmonary T1 tumors and assess the potential impact on patient management, a repository of 218 patients with histologically proven pulmonary T1 tumors was used. Virtual reduced-dose images were simulated at 25%- and 5%-dose levels. Tumor size, attenuation, and localization were scored by two experienced chest radiologists.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRadiology
June 2024
From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland (S.J., D.R., C.P.); and Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Clinical
Phys Med
June 2024
Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, United States; Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, United States; Clinical Imaging Physics Group, Duke University Medical Center, Du
Purpose: In this work, we define a signal detection based metrology to characterize the separability of two different multi-dimensional signals in spectral CT acquisitions.
Method: Signal response was modelled as a random process with a deterministic signal and stochastic noise component. A linear Hotelling observer was used to estimate a scalar test statistic distribution that predicts the likelihood of an intensity value belonging to a signal.
Sci Rep
March 2024
Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Labs, Clinical Imaging Physics Group, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Departments of Radiology, Physics, Biomedical Engineering, and Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, 2424 Erwin Road, Suite 302, Durham, NC, 27710
An updated extension of effective dose was recently introduced, namely relative effective dose ( ), incorporating age and sex factors. In this study we extended application to a population of about 9000 patients who underwent multiple CT imaging exams, and we compared it with other commonly used radiation protection metrics in terms of their correlation with radiation risk. Using Monte Carlo methods, , dose-length-product based effective dose ( ), organ-dose based effective dose ( ), and organ-dose based risk index ( ) were calculated for each patient.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMagn Reson Med
April 2024
Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Eur Radiol
May 2024
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of dose reduction on a commercially available lung cancer prediction convolutional neuronal network (LCP-CNN).
Methods: CT scans from a cohort provided by the local lung cancer center (n = 218) with confirmed pulmonary malignancies and their corresponding reduced dose simulations (25% and 5% dose) were subjected to the LCP-CNN. The resulting LCP scores (scale 1-10, increasing malignancy risk) and the proportion of correctly classified nodules were compared.
Med Phys
November 2023
Clinical Imaging Physics Group, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Background: Pulsed wave Doppler ultrasound is a useful modality for assessing vascular health as it quantifies blood flow characteristics. To facilitate accurate diagnosis, accuracy and consistency of this modality should be assessed through Doppler quality assurance (QA).
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to characterize the accuracy, reproducibility, and inter-scanner variability of ultrasound flow velocity measurements via a flow phantom, with a focus on the effect of systematic acquisition parameters on measured flow velocity accuracy.
Phys Med
October 2023
Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Clinical Imaging Physics Group, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Med Phys
November 2023
Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Background: High tube current generates a high flux of x-rays to photon counting detectors (PCDs) that can potentially result in the piling up of pulses formed by concurrent photons, which can cause count loss and energy resolution degradation.
Purpose: To evaluate the performance of clinical photon-counting CT (PCCT) systems in high flux, potentially influenced by pulse pileup effects, in terms of task-generic image quality metrics.
Methods: A clinical phantom was scanned on a commercial PCCT scanner (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens) at 120 kV under fourteen different tube current levels (40-1000 mA) with a rotation time of 0.
Med Phys
February 2024
Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Med Phys
September 2023
Department of Radiology, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Background: Quantitative imaging techniques, such as virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) and iodine quantification (IQ), have proven valuable diagnostic methods in several specific clinical tasks such as tumor and tissue differentiation. Recently, a new generation of computed tomography (CT) scanners equipped with photon-counting detectors (PCD) has reached clinical status.
Purpose: This work aimed to investigate the performance of a new photon-counting CT (PC-CT) in low-dose quantitative imaging tasks, comparing it to an earlier generation CT scanner with an energy-integrating detector dual-energy CT (DE-CT).
J Appl Clin Med Phys
August 2023
Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) systems are increasingly available in the U.S. following Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the first clinical PCCT system in Fall 2021.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTomography
April 2023
Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Due to the concerns about radiation dose associated with medical imaging, radiation dose monitoring systems (RDMSs) are now utilized by many radiology providers to collect, process, analyze, and manage radiation dose-related information. Currently, most commercially available RDMSs focus only on radiation dose information and do not track any metrics related to image quality. However, to enable comprehensive patient-based imaging optimization, it is equally important to monitor image quality as well.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Radiol
October 2023
Department of Radiology, Duke University Health System, 2301 Erwin Road, Box 3808, Durham, NC, 27110, USA.
Objectives: Evaluate a novel algorithm for noise reduction in obese patients using dual-source dual-energy (DE) CT imaging.
Methods: Seventy-nine patients with contrast-enhanced abdominal imaging (54 women; age: 58 ± 14 years; BMI: 39 ± 5 kg/m, range: 35-62 kg/m) from seven DECT (SOMATOM Flash or Force) were retrospectively included (01/2019-12/2020). Image domain data were reconstructed with the standard clinical algorithm (ADMIRE/SAFIRE 2), and denoised with a comparison (ME-NLM) and a test algorithm (rank-sparse kernel regression).
Clin Imaging
January 2023
Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, Houston, TX 77030-4009, United States of America. Electronic address:
Objectives: To provide our oncology-specific adult abdominal-pelvic CT reference levels for image noise and radiation dose from a high-volume, oncologic, tertiary referral center.
Methods: The portal venous phase abdomen-pelvis acquisition was assessed for image noise and radiation dose in 13,320 contrast-enhanced CT examinations. Patient size (effective diameter) and radiation dose (CTDI) were recorded using a commercial software system, and image noise (Global Noise metric) was quantified using a custom processing system.
Eur Radiol
March 2023
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Objectives: To compare the image quality and hepatic metastasis detection of low-dose deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) with full-dose filtered back projection (FBP)/iterative reconstruction (IR).
Methods: A contrast-detail phantom consisting of low-contrast objects was scanned at five CT dose index levels (10, 6, 3, 2, and 1 mGy). A total of 154 participants with 305 hepatic lesions who underwent abdominal CT were enrolled in a prospective non-inferiority trial with a three-arm design based on phantom results.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
April 2023
Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT represents the most recent generational advance in CT technology. PCD CT has the potential to reduce image noise, improve spatial resolution and contrast resolution, and provide multispectral capability, all of which may be achieved with an overall decrease in the radiation dose. These effects may be used to reduce the iodinated contrast media dose and potentially obtain multiphase images through a single-acquisition technique.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Radiol
November 2022
Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University, 2424 Erwin Rd, Ste. 302, Durham, NC 27705, USA; Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Duke University, 2424 Erwin Rd, Ste. 302, Durham, NC 27705, USA; Clinical Imaging Physics Group, Duke University Health System, 24
Objective: To devise a patient-informed time series model that predicts liver contrast enhancement, by integrating clinical data and pharmacokinetics models, and to assess its feasibility to improve enhancement consistency in contrast-enhanced liver CT scans.
Methods: The study included 1577 Chest/Abdomen/Pelvis CT scans, with 70-30% training/validation-testing split. A Gaussian function was used to approximate the early arterial, late arterial, and the portal venous phases of the contrast perfusion curve of each patient using their respective bolus tracking and diagnostic scan data.
Med Phys
August 2022
Center for Virtual Imaging Trials and Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Purpose: The gold-standard method for estimation of patient-specific organ doses in digital tomosynthesis (DT) requires protocol-specific Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of radiation transport in anatomically accurate computational phantoms. Although accurate, MC simulations are computationally expensive, leading to a turnaround time in the order of core hours for simulating a single exam. This limits their clinical utility.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Radiol
April 2022
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Purpose: To estimate cumulative organ doses and age- and gender-stratified cancer mortality risks in patients undergoing recurrent computed tomography (CT) exams.
Methods: Cohorts of patients who received cumulative effective dose ≥ 100 mSv were stratified into age and gender groups. Organ doses of 27 organs using Monte Carlo methods were available, and the relative risk model from the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII (BEIR VII) was used to estimate lifetime attributable cancer mortality risks (LACMR).
Insights Imaging
February 2022
Department of Medical Physics, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, P.za Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milano, Italy.
The evaluation of radiation burden in vivo is crucial in modern radiology as stated also in the European Directive 2013/59/Euratom-Basic Safety Standard. Although radiation dose monitoring can impact the justification and optimization of radiological procedure, as well as effective patient communication, standardization of radiation monitoring software is far to be achieved. Toward this goal, the Italian Association of Medical Physics (AIFM) published a report describing the state of the art and standard guidelines in radiation dose monitoring system quality assurance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRadiology
April 2022
From the Departments of Abdominal Imaging (C.T.J., S.G., M.M.S., V.K.W., U.S., N.A.W.B.), Physics (X.L.), and Biostatistics (W.Q.), the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1473, Houston, TX 77030-4009; and Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Im
Background Assessment of liver lesions is constrained as CT radiation doses are lowered; evidence suggests deep learning reconstructions mitigate such effects. Purpose To evaluate liver metastases and image quality between reduced-dose deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and standard-dose filtered back projection (FBP) contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. Materials and Methods In this prospective Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study (September 2019 through April 2021), participants with biopsy-proven colorectal cancer and liver metastases at baseline CT underwent standard-dose and reduced-dose portal venous abdominal CT in the same breath hold.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF