98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Pheochromocytoma (PCC) is a rare neuroendocrine tumor, with 10-15% of cases showing malignant behavior defined by metastatic spread, including exceptionally rare central nervous system (CNS) involvement. Brain metastases present unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their potential to impair neurological function. This study reports a case of malignant PCC (mPCC) with CNS metastases and a systematic review to clarify the clinical patterns, management strategies, and prognostic factors.
Methods: We describe the surgically managed case of a 41-year-old man with right frontoparietal brain metastasis. A systematic review, adhering to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed studies on mPCC with brain or spinal metastases confirmed by radiology or histopathology. Data on demographics, symptoms, imaging, treatments, and outcomes were extracted and descriptively analyzed using Python-generated graphics.
Results: This review identified 18 cranial (1948-2022) and 60 spinal (1977-2024) metastasis cases from 53 studies. Cranial metastases were present at a mean age of 46.6 years (SD 14.1), commonly with headaches (44.4%) and neurological deficits, such as weakness, presented in our case, with 72.2% surgically treated. Spinal metastases occurred at a mean age of 44.5 years (SD, 16.0), often with hypertension (51.7%) or pain, with a mean of 1.7 lesions (SD 1.5). The patient achieved short-term symptom relief post-resection, but incomplete follow-up (33.3% cranial) and reporting gaps (63.3% spinal laterality) limited the prognostic insights. MRI and PET improved the diagnostic accuracy over historical non-contrast CT use (41.7% spinal cases).
Interpretation: CNS mPCC metastases are exceedingly rare with distinct neurological (cranial) and structural (spinal) presentations. Advanced imaging, particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET), is critical for accurate diagnosis and surgical planning. Sparse data underscores the need for registries and prospective studies to standardize care and improve outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12414785 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2025.1633411 | DOI Listing |
Wounds
August 2025
Department of Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Ceará, Brazil.
Background: To estimate the prevalence of biofilms in chronic wounds.
Methods: The authors performed a systematic review of prevalence studies and meta-analysis, structured according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles were searched in Scopus (Elsevier), Web of Science (Clarivate), MEDLINE/PubMed (National Institutes of Health), and Embase (Elsevier) databases.
J Neurol
September 2025
Department of General Practice, The First People's Hospital of Lin'an District, Hangzhou, Lin'an People's Hospital Affiliated to Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Anti-mGluR1 encephalitis is a rare autoimmune disorder manifesting with cerebellar syndrome with varying levels of severity. However, limited data exist regarding the clinical features and treatment strategies for patients suffering from encephalitis associated with anti-mGluR1 antibodies. Herein, we comprehensively review and discuss clinical features of anti-mGluR1 encephalitis to enhance our understanding of this rare disorder.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Colorectal Dis
September 2025
University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 2ZD, Scotland, UK.
Background: The optimal management of synchronous rectal cancer (RC) and prostate cancer (PC) remains unclear. This systematic review evaluates treatment strategies and reports postoperative, oncological, and quality-of-life outcomes in patients treated with curative intent.
Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024598049).
Surg Endosc
September 2025
Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Background: The implementation of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) for perihilar (PHC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) remains limited and a systematic review including only comparative studies of MILS versus the open approach is lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery in patients with hilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.
Methods: Systematic review in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for original studies comparing at least five patients undergoing MILS with open liver surgery for PHC and IHC.
Surg Endosc
September 2025
Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Background: Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) is used more commonly, but this surge is mostly based on observational data. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the short-term outcomes between MIPD and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) using data collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases for RCTs comparing MIPD and OPD published before December 10, 2024.