98%
921
2 minutes
20
Correctly identifying an individual's social context from passively worn sensors holds promise for delivering just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) to treat social anxiety. In this study, we present results using passively collected data from a within-subjects experiment that assessed physiological responses across different social contexts (i.e., alone vs. with others), social phases (i.e., pre- and post-interaction vs. during an interaction), social interaction sizes (i.e., dyadic vs. group interactions), and levels of social threat (i.e., implicit vs. explicit social evaluation). Participants in the study ( = 46) reported moderate to severe social anxiety symptoms as assessed by the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (≥34 out of 80). Univariate paired difference tests, multivariate random forest models, and cluster analyses were used to explore physiological response patterns across different social and non-social contexts. Our results suggest that social context is more reliably distinguishable than social phase, group size, or level of social threat, and that there is considerable variability in physiological response patterns even among distinguishable contexts. Implications for real-world context detection and future deployment of JITAIs are discussed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416631 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/taffc.2025.3562787 | DOI Listing |
JMIR Hum Factors
September 2025
Department of Community Health Systems, University of California, San Francisco, School of Nursing, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic forced the world to quarantine to slow the rate of transmission, causing communities to transition into virtual spaces. Asian American and Pacific Islander communities faced the additional challenge of discrimination that stemmed from racist and xenophobic rhetoric in the media. Limited data exist on technology use among Asian American and Pacific Islander adults during the height of the COVID-19 shelter-in-place period and its effect on their physical and mental health.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Med Internet Res
September 2025
School of Nursing, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Background: The spread of misinformation on social media poses significant risks to public health and individual decision-making. Despite growing recognition of these threats, instruments that assess resilience to misinformation on social media, particularly among families who are central to making decisions on behalf of children, remain scarce.
Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a novel instrument that measures resilience to misinformation in the context of social media among parents of school-age children.
Nutr Health
September 2025
Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
BackgroundCoronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to dramatic changes including social distancing, closure of schools, travel bans, and issues of stay-at-home orders. The health-care field has been transformed with elective procedures and on-site visits being deferred. Telemedicine has emerged as a novel mechanism to continue to provide care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF