Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
In future traffic environments dominated by highly autonomous vehicles (AVs), pedestrians may face challenges in accurately interpreting AV behavior, thereby potentially increasing the risk of pedestrian-AV interactions. External human-machine interfaces (eHMIs) have been proposed to facilitate communication between AVs and pedestrians; however, comprehensive evaluations using objective data from real-world interactions are limited. This study developed a systematic evaluation framework grounded in the ISO 9241-11 standard, integrating four key indicators: decision accuracy, comprehensibility, decision efficiency, and perceived safety. Objective data were collected through behavioral observation and eye tracking, with decision accuracy, total fixation time, decision time, and the coefficient of variation of pupil diameter as quantitative metrics. The study examined the effects of eHMI types (light-band, symbol, text), deceleration strategies (gentle, early, aggressive braking, no braking), and yielding behaviors (yielding, non-yielding) on pedestrian decision-making and perceptions. A total of 24 participants were recruited for a real-world crossing interaction experiment. The results showed that eHMIs significantly improved decision accuracy under yielding conditions, while decision accuracy remained high under non-yielding conditions regardless of eHMI type. eHMIs enhanced comprehensibility, with symbol-based and text-based eHMIs performing better than light-band eHMIs. eHMIs also improved pedestrian decision efficiency and perceived safety, with significant differences observed across different eHMI types and yielding behaviors. Furthermore, while deceleration strategies had no significant effect on eHMI comprehensibility or decision efficiency, they played a crucial role in shaping perceived safety. These findings inform the design of eHMIs and deceleration strategies to optimize pedestrian-AV interactions, contributing to safer AV integration in traffic environments.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2025.108227 | DOI Listing |