Using a Refutation Text to Improve School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists' Knowledge of Dyslexia.

Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch

Center for Childhood Deafness, Language and Learning, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE.

Published: September 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Misconceptions about dyslexia abound among the public and educators alike. Refutation texts have been used to change misconceptions about a variety of topics, mostly in science education. The purpose of this study was to determine whether reading a refutation text about dyslexia could improve knowledge of dyslexia among school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs).

Method: Participants were school-based SLPs ( = 37). They completed a pretest of knowledge of dyslexia, were randomly assigned to read a refutation text or comparison text about dyslexia, and then completed a posttest of knowledge of dyslexia. They completed a maintenance test of knowledge of dyslexia approximately 4 weeks after completing the posttest. Data were analyzed using a two-way mixed analysis of variance with follow-up tests.

Results: There were statistically significant main effects of testing time (pretest, posttest, maintenance) and group (refutation text, comparison test). There was also a statistically significant time-by-group interaction. The refutation text group demonstrated more accurate knowledge of dyslexia than the comparison group at the posttest time point and at the maintenance time point. Additionally, the refutation text group demonstrated less forgetting between the posttest and maintenance time points than the comparison text group.

Conclusion: The refutation text was more effective than the comparison text for improving school SLPs' knowledge of dyslexia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2025_LSHSS-24-00133DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

refutation text
28
knowledge dyslexia
28
comparison text
12
dyslexia
10
text
9
refutation
8
school-based speech-language
8
text dyslexia
8
text comparison
8
dyslexia completed
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: Misconceptions about dyslexia abound among the public and educators alike. Refutation texts have been used to change misconceptions about a variety of topics, mostly in science education. The purpose of this study was to determine whether reading a refutation text about dyslexia could improve knowledge of dyslexia among school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Research on psychological child maltreatment is impeded by a lack of high-quality structured data. Crucial information is often documented in child protective services (CPS) case files, but only in narrative form. Recent research on the utilization of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods with large language models (LLMs) for extracting structured data from narratives has demonstrated significant potential.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Rumor spreading has been posing a significant threat to maintain the normal social order. In this paper, we propose a ISDR rumor propagation model on scale-free networks that considers fractional-order and refutation mechanism. we acquire basic reproduction number [Formula: see text] based on the rumor equilibrium point [Formula: see text], which thoroughly characterizes the dynamics of rumor propagation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The current study addressed the often-overlooked role of epistemic emotions in refuting misinformation by replicating and expanding on the work of Trevors and Kendeou (2020). It broadened the participant pool beyond well-educated college students and introduced a novel dynamic measure, "DynamicEmo", to capture epistemic emotions experienced while reading refutation texts in a more fine-grained way. Results reaffirmed that positive, negative, and standard refutation texts (vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Online health information is widely available, but a substantial portion of it is inaccurate or misleading, including exaggerated, incomplete, or unverified claims. Such misinformation can significantly influence public health decisions and pose serious challenges to health care systems. With advances in artificial intelligence and natural language processing, pretrained large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in identifying and distinguishing misleading health information, although their effectiveness in this area remains underexplored.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF