A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Real-World Implementation of Contingency Management and Benefits of a Controlled Environment "Head Start". | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objectives: To use quality improvement (QI) principles to implement contingency management (CM) in an outpatient clinic.

Methods: Prize-based CM was implemented for stimulant use disorder using standard protocols with QI processes used to improve efficiency and effectiveness.

Results: CM was successfully implemented in an outpatient addictions clinic using clinical funds. Participants who were discharged to the outpatient clinic from a controlled environment (such as hospital, withdrawal management, residential treatment program) had 8.3 (SD = 3.1) weeks of consecutive abstinence (CA) and 10.7 (SD = 1.0) weeks total abstinence.

Conclusions: Pragmatic clinical implementation of CM yielded results that are comparable to controlled trials in similar populations. QI processes identified that a controlled environment resulted in significant ongoing abstinence.CM was implemented in a small community clinic with no additional funding, and QI principles were used to improve efficiency and effectiveness. The initial implementation of 17 participants yielded a mean of 2.2 (SD = 3.2) weeks of CA. Recent discharge from a controlled environment resulted in 8.3 (3.1) weeks CA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70710DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

controlled environment
16
contingency management
8
improve efficiency
8
controlled
5
real-world implementation
4
implementation contingency
4
management benefits
4
benefits controlled
4
environment
4
environment "head
4

Similar Publications