Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
We evaluated the effectiveness of using blood agar (BA) and Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) together to isolate fungi and Pythium insidiosum for the diagnosis of fungal and Pythium keratitis respectively. The overall recovery rate was higher in SDA than BA (93.75 % vs 88.28 %; p = 0.595). BA demonstrated lower isolation of dematiaceous fungi (unadjusted p = 0.039: FDR adjusted p = 0.062). 11.71 % and 6.25 % of fungal isolates were not recovered on BA and SDA, respectively. While BA showed faster growth of fungi than SDA (unadjusted p = 0.002; FDR adjusted p = 0.005), both BA and SDA showed rapid recovery of Aspergillus spp. as compared to Fusarium spp. (unadjusted p < 0.001; FDR adjusted p = 0.004). The combined use of both media may enhance detection of certain fungi missed by either medium alone, hence guiding the appropriate patient management.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107247 | DOI Listing |