Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: To identify and explore the latent categories of self-control and clarify the relationship between self-control and self-management of stroke survivors under different categories.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted using a general information questionnaire, the Chinese version of the Dual-Mode Self-Control Scale, and the Stroke Self-Management Scale to measure sociodemographic data, self-control, and self-management. The questionnaires were administered face-to-face, and a convenience sampling method was used to collect the data. A total of 519 stroke survivors from a tertiary hospital in Henan Province, China, were included. Data were analyzed using latent profile analysis (LPA) and the Kruskal-Wallis H test.
Results: The four-profile model was the most suitable. It was named as follows: low impulse-high control group (25.1%), low impulse-low control group (39.7%), high impulse-high control group (24.7%) and high impulse-low control group (10.6%). The self-management scores of the low impulse and high control group were significantly higher than those of the other three groups.
Conclusion: Stroke survivors demonstrate moderate levels of self-control. In particular, patients with ambivalent self-control psychologies are noteworthy, as they require strategies to address this contradictory psychological situation. Healthcare providers should consider the unique self-control characteristics of stroke survivors to assist them in enhancing their self-control abilities. Future research should use more objective assessment methods to examine long-term changes in self-control among stroke survivors and their relationships with self-management.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2025.07.002 | DOI Listing |