A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

A Cascaded Segmentation-Classification Deep Learning Framework for Preoperative Prediction of Occult Peritoneal Metastasis and Early Recurrence in Advanced Gastric Cancer. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To develop a cascaded deep learning (DL) framework integrating tumor segmentation with metastatic risk stratification for preoperative prediction of occult peritoneal metastasis (OPM) in advanced gastric cancer (GC), and validate its generalizability for early peritoneal recurrence (PR) prediction.

Methods: This multicenter study enrolled 765 patients with advanced GC from three institutions. We developed a two-stage framework as follows: (1) V-Net-based tumor segmentation on CT; (2) DL-based metastatic risk classification using segmented tumor regions. Clinicopathological predictors were integrated with deep learning probabilities to construct a combined model. Validation cohorts comprised: Internal validation (Test1 for OPM, n=168; Test2 for early PR, n=212) and External validation (Test3 for early PR, n=57 from two independent centers).

Results: Multivariable analysis identified Borrmann type (OR=1.314, 95% CI: 1.239-1.394), CA125 ≥35U/mL (OR=1.301, 95% CI: 1.127-1.499), and CT-N+ stage (OR=1.259, 95% CI: 1.124-1.415) as independent OPM predictors. The combined model demonstrated robust performance for both OPM and early PR prediction: achieving AUCs of 0.938 (Train) and 0.916 (Test1) for OPM with improvements over clinical (∆AUC +0.039-+0.107) and DL-only models (∆AUC +0.044-+0.104), while attaining AUC 0.820-0.825 for early PR (Test2 and Test3) with balanced sensitivity (79.7-88.9%) and specificity (72.4-73.3%). Decision curve analysis confirmed net clinical benefit across clinical thresholds.

Conclusion: This CT-based cascaded framework enables reliable preoperative risk stratification for OPM and early PR in advanced GC, potentially refining indications for personalized therapeutic pathways.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.08.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

deep learning
12
learning framework
8
preoperative prediction
8
prediction occult
8
occult peritoneal
8
peritoneal metastasis
8
advanced gastric
8
gastric cancer
8
tumor segmentation
8
metastatic risk
8

Similar Publications