98%
921
2 minutes
20
Aim: This study aims to evaluate the application effect of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT)-driven blended teaching model in nursing rounds.
Background: Traditional teacher-centered nursing rounds often lead to passive learning and low efficiency. It remains uncertain whether ChatGPT-based nursing rounds is superior to traditional teaching in nursing rounds.
Design: A quasi-experimental study was conducted, involving pretest and post-test assessments with both a study group and a control group.
Methods: A total of 124 nursing students from three tertiary hospitals were divided into two groups. The teaching intervention (TI) group, consisting of 64 participants, received training using a ChatGPT-driven teaching rounds. In contrast, the traditional teaching (TT) group, with 60 participants, underwent conventional nursing rounds. The impact of these two teaching methods on nursing rounds was compared through pre- and post-training evaluations of professional skills and questionnaires.
Results: Following the intervention, nursing students in the TI group exhibited enhanced clinical competency and critical thinking ability compared with those in the control group (p < 0.05 for both). Furthermore, the learning efficiency of students in the TI group was elevated and they provided a more favorable evaluation of the innovative ward round teaching method.
Conclusion: Traditional nursing rounds adopt a conventional method, whereas the ChatGPT-integrated blended teaching model revolutionizes them. It boosts students' clinical skills, critical thinking and scenario comprehension, enabling them to tackle complex cases and make sound judgments. Additionally, it optimizes learning efficiency, saving time and facilitating targeted teaching.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104545 | DOI Listing |
Disabil Rehabil
September 2025
Yang Memorial Methodist Social Service, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Purpose: This study aimed to develop an ICF core set for assessing stroke survivors in community-based rehabilitation settings in Hong Kong.
Material And Methods: A three-round Delphi process which involved 39 multidisciplinary experts in community-based rehabilitation services was conducted to reach consensus on a preliminary version of ICF core set for stroke survivors. The initial questionnaire included 130 second-level ICF categories while the panel was invited to suggest additional categories.
Eur J Prev Cardiol
September 2025
Department of Cardiology, Esbjerg and Grindsted Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark.
Aim: This study aimed to establish general consensus on a systematic needs assessment model to determine eligibility for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) as part of secondary prevention in individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF). Specific objectives included identifying relevant needs assessment criteria and establishing consensus on referral criteria.
Methods: A Delphi study was conducted following the ACCORD guidelines (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document) with participation of an international, multi-disciplinary expert panel including physicians, nurses and other healthcare professionals, across primary and secondary care as well as academic research.
Background: Holistic reviews play a crucial role in enhancing the diversity of health care workers, ensuring they can meet the needs of a varied population. Although extensive research highlights the importance of holistic reviews, there is a noticeable gap in understanding how applicants perceive this process.
Method: A pre- and postinterview survey was given to 279 applicants, over three separate holistic interview events.
Pediatr Crit Care Med
September 2025
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Objective: To develop a set of pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC) entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM).
Design: Survey and Delphi methodology in a panel of experts from the Pediatric Neurocritical Care Research Group (PNCRG) and the Education in Pediatric Intensive Care (EPIC) Research Collaborative.
Setting: Interprofessional local focus group, national focus group, and subsequent national multi-institutional, multidisciplinary expert panel in the United States.
Age Ageing
August 2025
Department of Social Determinants of Health, Division of Healthier Populations, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
The Abuse of Older People - Intervention Accelerator (AOP-IA) project aims to accelerate the development of effective interventions to prevent and reduce AOP aged 60 and older within the framework of the United Nations Decade of Healthy Ageing (2021-2030). The AOP-IA was launched in response to the global need for interventions with proven effectiveness, as few existing approaches have been rigorously evaluated. This paper focuses on the first two phases of the AOP-IA project, which involved conducting a systematic search, screening and evaluation process to identify candidate interventions ready to be rigorously evaluated in future stages of the project, as well as establishing a network of intervention developers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF