98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The practice of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) in breast surgery remains debated. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature evaluating the current evidence on the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in nononcologic breast surgery, including risk-reducing mastectomy, gender-affirming mastectomy, augmentation, and reduction.
Methods: A literature search of PubMed and Cochrane databases of 1990-2025 was conducted to identify studies evaluating antibiotic prophylaxis and SSI outcomes in nononcologic breast surgery. Included studies were screened and analyzed by procedure type, study design, and outcomes.
Results: The impact of antibiotic prophylaxis varied by procedure type. For risk-reducing mastectomy, the results were mixed. Multiple clinical trials indicated no significant reduction in SSI with antibiotic prophylaxis, while one meta-analysis and one cohort study suggested that antibiotics may decrease the risk of SSI. Additionally, one randomized controlled trial in overweight or obese patients indicated that antibiotic prophylaxis significantly decreased SSI in risk reducing mastectomy. In gender-affirming mastectomy, infection rates were low (approximately 3%-5%), and evidence supports single-dose preoperative prophylaxis. For breast reduction, multiple systematic reviews and clinical trials indicated a significant reduction in SSI with prophylactic treatment. Two randomized controlled trials indicated that extending antibiotic prophylaxis into the postoperative period had no significant impact on SSI. For breast augmentation, systematic reviews and clinical studies found no significant reduction in SSI with prophylactic antibiotic treatment. While one systematic review suggested SSI reduction in implant-based reconstruction, this was not observed in breast augmentation.
Conclusions: The use of antibiotic prophylaxis within nononcologic breast surgery remains poorly defined, with reported effectiveness varying depending on the type of surgery, duration of treatment, and risk factors of the patient. Further high-quality clinical trials are warranted to fully evaluate the role of prophylactic antibiotic use in nononcologic breast surgery.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004474 | DOI Listing |
Int J Gynecol Cancer
August 2025
Northwell Health, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, New Hyde Park, NY, USA; Northwell Health, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Manhas
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the combination of cefazolin or a second-generation cephalosporin plus metronidazole is associated with a reduced risk of surgical site infection in women undergoing hysterectomy for gynecologic cancer compared to using cefazolin or a second-generation cephalosporin alone.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent hysterectomy at a single institution between January 2020 and June 2022. The primary outcome was surgical site infection.
Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek
June 2025
Department of Infectious Diseases and Travel Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic, e-mail:
Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) represent a diverse spectrum of conditions, including erysipelas, cellulitis, cutaneous abscesses, necrotizing fasciitis, and myonecrosis. Erysipelas and cellulitis are the most common community-acquired SSTIs. Erysipelas is typically caused by pyogenic streptococci, while cellulitis often has a staphylococcal etiology.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBull Cancer
September 2025
Direction des soins, centre hospitalier de Brive, 2, boulevard du Dr-Verlhac, 19100 Brive, France. Electronic address:
Multiple myeloma is a haematologic malignancy of the bone marrow with an increasing incidence, primarily affecting an elderly and frail population. It benefits from innovative treatments that have been shown to extend patient survival. However, 2% of patients die from infections during the first year of treatment, despite the availability of prophylactic treatments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
September 2025
Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa, Italy.
Aim: Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) combines vaginal and laparoscopic techniques and is increasingly used in gynecologic surgery. Given the lack of standardized guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis, this review aims to evaluate infection rates, current prophylactic practices, and recommendations.
Method: A literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and keywords such as "v-NOTES," "infection," "prophylaxis," and "antibiotics".
Ann Plast Surg
September 2025
From the Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Background: The practice of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) in breast surgery remains debated. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature evaluating the current evidence on the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in nononcologic breast surgery, including risk-reducing mastectomy, gender-affirming mastectomy, augmentation, and reduction.
Methods: A literature search of PubMed and Cochrane databases of 1990-2025 was conducted to identify studies evaluating antibiotic prophylaxis and SSI outcomes in nononcologic breast surgery.