98%
921
2 minutes
20
Cell and tissue engineering therapies provide promise for regenerating damaged intervertebral disc (IVD) tissue and resolving the low back pain that often accompanies it. However, these treatments remain experimental and unavailable for patients. Furthermore, the large body of work characterizing and utilizing mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for these applications has, unfortunately, not resulted in any FDA-approved spinal therapies. Herein, we characterized DiscGenics's human cadaver-derived discogenic nucleus pulposus (NP) progenitor cells and, for the first time, their discogenic annulus fibrosus (AF) progenitor cells. We then used these discogenic NP and AF cells to create biomimetic human-sized total tissue-engineered IVD replacements, also known as endplate-modified angle ply structures (eDAPS), and compared these with eDAPS formulated with goat or human MSCs. Prior to eDAPS fabrication, discogenic cells were expanded using either two-dimensional attachment culture or three-dimensional suspension culture. Currently, no data exist as to how these discogenic progenitor cells deposit extracellular matrix in a 3D culture environment, nor do data exist characterizing whether the unique expansion environment influences subsequent discogenic cell behavior. Our data support that NP and AF discogenic cells occupy unique niches and serve distinct functions, both in the IVD and in an 3D culture environment. As a result, discogenic cells deposited more matrix overall than did MSCs. That matrix was distinct between the NP and AF analogs of the tissue-engineered IVDs while also being more homogeneous within each region. Most importantly, unlike both MSC groups, discogenic cells deposited little to no collagen X, suggesting that discogenic eDAPS possess a more stable regional phenotype that will be less susceptible to hypertrophy and downstream calcification. Overall, DiscGenics's discogenic NP and AF cells made compositionally and mechanically superior eDAPS when compared with both human and goat MSCs, with only minor differences between attachment- and suspension-derived discogenic cell eDAPS, supporting their use as a cell source for the creation of human-scale living whole disc replacements.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19373341251373104 | DOI Listing |
Tissue Eng Part A
September 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Cell and tissue engineering therapies provide promise for regenerating damaged intervertebral disc (IVD) tissue and resolving the low back pain that often accompanies it. However, these treatments remain experimental and unavailable for patients. Furthermore, the large body of work characterizing and utilizing mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for these applications has, unfortunately, not resulted in any FDA-approved spinal therapies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFree Radic Biol Med
August 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, China. Electronic address:
Discogenic lower back pain (DLBP) is a prevalent lumbar disorder. Functional Anesthetic Discography (FAD) is the primary diagnostic method for DLBP, with a high positivity rate. However, the mechanism by which lidocaine, a local anesthetic commonly used in FAD, induces damage to intervertebral disc cells remains unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPain Pract
September 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Introduction: Discogenic low back pain can be severely disabling, clinically challenging to diagnose, and expensive to treat. Disc degeneration is characterized by disc dehydration, which diminishes the ability of the disc to distribute pressure, making it more susceptible to damage, and leading to annular tears, fissures, and a higher incidence of herniation. Furthermore, the abnormal annular in-growth of nerves and inflammation of the disc increase the number and sensitivity of nociceptors, leading to chronic discogenic low back pain (CDLBP).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImmunol Res
July 2025
Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University, No. 357, Ximen Street, Longting District, Kaifeng City, Henan Province, China.
Discogenic low back pain (DLBP) is one of the main causes of chronic low back pain, and its core pathological mechanism is due to various molecular changes caused by intervertebral disc degeneration. The normal intervertebral disc is composed of the nucleus pulposus, annulus fibrosus, and cartilaginous endplate, and has structural characteristics without blood vessels or nerves, relying on dispersed support to maintain homeostasis. During the process of degeneration, nucleus pulposus cells undergo apoptosis and cell senescence, its synthesis ability decreases, and the balance of extracellular matrix (ECM) is disrupted.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInterv Pain Med
September 2025
PM&R Section, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Summary Of Background: The field of orthobiologics has attempted to address the challenge of discogenic low back pain (LBP). Research in areas such as stem cells, platelet-rich plasma, and specific growth factor injections has seen limited success.
Objective: The purpose of this trial was to determine the efficacy of a single intradiscal bone marrow concentrate (BMC) injection on pain and function for chronic discogenic LBP.