Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
This study examined whether preschoolers' (N = 32, 19 boys and 13 girls, aged 5-6 years, aged M = 5.3, SD = 0.49 years) perceived motor competence (PMC) moderates the effects of focus of attention (internal vs. external) on throwing performance. We evaluated both movement outcome and movement form, and used throwing distance as an alternative movement outcome to the accuracy outcome measures often used in previous studies. Movement outcome (throwing distance) was measured using the standard measuring tape, and movement form (throwing score) was assessed using the Test of Gross Motor Development-Third Edition (TGMD-3). The latest version of the Pictorial Scale for Perceived Movement Skill Competence (PMSC aligned with the TGMD-3) was used to assess the participants' PMC. 32 children were assigned to high/low-PMC groups receiving internal or external focus instructions, followed by acquisition (30 trials), retention, and transfer tests (10 trials each). Results revealed (1) for children with high PMC, neither their movement outcome nor movement form benefited from any attentional focus; (2) for children with low PMC, their movement form achieved better learning under the guidance of internal focus, while movement outcome were not affected by attentional focus. This indicates that matching appropriate attentional focus instructions for children with low PMC is beneficial to their motor learning. Future research should further explore differences in children with different PMC and the mechanisms linking them to attentional focus.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105493 | DOI Listing |