A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Comparison of oncological outcomes between wedge resection and segmentectomy for T1a/bN0M0 non-small-cell lung cancer: a population-based retrospective cohort study. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Sublobar resection, including wedge resection (WR) and segmental resection (SR) has been considered for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal sublobar approach continues to be a subject of extensive debate within the thoracic surgical community. This study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of WR and SR in such patients.

Methods: T1a/bN0M0 NSCLC patients who underwent WR or SR between 2000 and 2019 were retrospectively retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to establish a balanced cohort, and overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were statistically analyzed.

Results: A total of 4112 patients were included, with 3283 (79.8%) in the WR group and 829 (20.2%) in the SR group. Following 1:1 PSM, 764 patients in each group were further evaluated. The SR group exhibited significantly longer OS (P < 0.001) and CSS (P = 0.032) compared to the WR group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that SR was independently associated with improved survival outcomes (P < 0.001, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-0.90 for OS; P = 0.036, HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65-0.99 for CSS). Additionally, variables such as sex, race, tumor grade, and histological type were identified as independent factors predictive of both OS and CSS. In subgroup analysis adjusted for all covariates, patients with tumors measuring 1-2 cm demonstrated a significant association between SR and improved OS and CSS.

Conclusion: Segmentectomy provided superior oncological outcomes for NSCLC ≤ 2 cm in the overall cohort, whereas there were no significant differences in OS and CSS between the two sublobar procedures for tumors of 0-1 cm. WR may be a reasonable option for 0-1 cm tumors in select cases, particularly for peripheral lesions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000003433DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oncological outcomes
8
wedge resection
8
non-small-cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
comparison oncological
4
outcomes wedge
4
resection
4
resection segmentectomy
4
segmentectomy t1a/bn0m0
4
t1a/bn0m0 non-small-cell
4

Similar Publications